December 9, 2005
THE PRC VS THE CHINESE:
Chinese Police Kill Villagers During Two-Day Land Protest (Edward Cody, December 9, 2005, Washington Post)
Paramilitary police and anti-riot units opened fire with pistols and automatic rifles Tuesday night and Wednesday night on farmers and fishermen who had attacked them with gasoline bombs and explosive charges, according to residents of this small coastal village.The sustained volleys of gunfire, unprecedented in a wave of peasant uprisings over the last two years in China, killed between 10 and 20 villagers and injured more, according to the residents. The count was uncertain, they said, because a number of villagers could not be located after the confrontations.
The tough response by black-clad riot troops and People's Armed Police in camouflage fatigues deviated sharply from previous government tactics against the spreading unrest in Chinese villages and industrial suburbs. As far as is known, authorities put down all previous riots using truncheons and tear gas, but without firearms.
This time, according to a witness, police responded to villagers throwing explosives by firing "very rapid bursts of gunfire" over a period of several hours both nights. Some villagers reported seeing police carrying AK-47 assault rifles, one of the Chinese military's standard-issue weapons.
Younger folk sometimes ask with wonder how it's possible that all of the intelligence agencies, academia, and the MSM were taken by surprise when the USSR collapsed exactly as Reagan and Solzhenitsyn had said it inevitably would. Well, pick up a paper today and you'll see the whole dynamic playing out again. For every one story about the centrifugal forces that are tearing China apart you'll find five or ten about how they're destined to be our next superpower peer. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 9, 2005 8:01 AM
If the PLA has to distribute 2 or 3 million conscripts around the country just to keep order, it suddenly doesn't seem so big, now does it?
Posted by: ratbert at December 9, 2005 8:51 AMBlack-clad riot police. We may wonder about the color of their helicopters.
Posted by: Lou Gots at December 9, 2005 10:22 AMIt's prudent to prepare for both eventualities. If China breaks up, how will we secure its nuclear weapons from terrorists? What if it stays strong enough to launch an attack on Taiwan, either because it survived its time of turmoil and is more united or hopes a foreign excursion will unite the people behind them?
Posted by: Chris Durnell at December 9, 2005 10:31 AMthe prc is our next pinata. look what that role did for poor old russia -- beat into a bloody pulp and left to rot.
Posted by: sun tzu at December 9, 2005 10:37 AMsun tzu, the difference between China and Russia is that after 80 years of truly brilliant Bolshevik dictatorship, poor Russia had absolutely nothing to fall back on. No real friends abroad, no generation that remembered the pre-Bolshevik ways of farming and doing business, nothing. But if Communist China collapses, it can count on receiving massive help from millions of talented people in Hong Kong and especially Taiwan.
The potential problem is, what happens if the Chinese Communists realize their great dream and seize and thereby ruin Taiwan before their inevitable downfall? Under that scenario, China will be in the same situation that Russia is in, and its people will no one to blame but themselves for their own narrowminded nationalism.
Posted by: X at December 9, 2005 12:25 PMOJ:
I'm curious as to whether you personally had any premonition that the Soviet Union was about to fall apart.
Just incidentally, older Catholics of my aquaintance relate that, at least partially due to the Fatima prophecy, it was normal in Catholic churches to regularly pray for the conversion of Russia. It thus seems rather interesting that Thatcher, Reagan, and John Paul all showed up at about the same time.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at December 9, 2005 3:16 PMMatt:
I had a class on Soviet State and Society at Colgate in 1981 with one of the few Sovietologists you'd find in Academia who put no stock in its survival--he was, of course, denied tenure. One of the assignments he gave us was to read the articles in Soviet newsmagazines and stuff that begged people to stop drinking so much. One was about the guys who serviced their air force drinking the jet fuel. As he put it, a state whose people are reduced to drinking jet fuel to escape the emptiness of their lives is not in it for the long term.
Posted by: oj at December 9, 2005 3:50 PMHydraulic fluid, oj, not fuel. Russian tanks and planes used alchohol-based hydraulic fluid, and getting the crews to refrain from drinking it was a problem as far back as WWII.
Posted by: joe shropshire at December 9, 2005 4:27 PMjet fuel:
http://www.ias.org.uk/publications/theglobe/98issue1/globe9801_p2.html
Posted by: oj at December 9, 2005 4:34 PMMy father-in-law said they used to drink "torpedo juice" in WWII.
Posted by: jdkelly at December 9, 2005 5:18 PMIn The Thin Red Line, James Jones wrote about the soldiers on Guadalcanal buying up all the Aqua Velva to get drunk on as soon as a PX was set up. Eventually, they learned that it made a nice cocktail when mixed with grapefruit juice.
Posted by: Al Cornpone at December 9, 2005 6:34 PMKitty Dukakis was getting ripped on hair care products.
Posted by: oj at December 9, 2005 8:14 PMBrylcreem?
Posted by: jdkelly at December 9, 2005 8:15 PMsaw a show where indians were drinking paint to get off on. damn, i like to get out of my head as much as the next clone but paint ?! seems like someone on guad. would have known how to ferment fruit...
Posted by: ward churchill at December 9, 2005 10:19 PMOJ:
Amusing that one Colgate professor caught the import of that story while dozens of people who quite possibly had better "credentials" missed it entirely.
I take a graduate-level class from a history professor who is mind-bogglingly intelligent and also totally without illusions as to what the Soviet Union represented. His saving grace appears to be a native common sense combined with the experience of living behind the Iron Curtain for a number of years as a visiting scholar.
Anyway, he once told our class that whenever he's feeling glum about the way the world is going, he thinks of four things: 1.) There's no more Jim Crow, 2.) Polio is eradicated, 3.) His daughter has opportunities that his wife never had, and 4.) The Soviet Union is gone for good.
Posted by: Matt Murphy at December 10, 2005 7:03 AM