November 23, 2005

WHO NEEDS A SECRET POLICE WHEN YOU’VE GOT LIFE COACHES

The age of unreason (Frank Furedi, The Spectator, November 19th, 2005)

To this day I am astonished when I hear that sensible, biologically mature adults allow themselves to be treated as if they were incompetent dimwits by a new army of professional surrogate parents. In days of old, traditional authority figures, like priests, instructed us how to behave in public and told us which rules to observe. Today’s experts are even freer with their advice. They do not simply tell us what to do and think, but also how to feel. A new army of life coaches, lifestyle gurus, professional celebrities, parenting coaches, super-nannies, makeover experts, healers, facilitators, mentors and guides regularly lecture us about the most intimate details of our existence. They are not simply interested in monitoring public behaviour but in colonising our internal life.

Life coaches ‘support’ us with making transitions in our private life while their colleagues feng shui our mundane existence. And every aspect of daily life has become a target of a makeover project. It is sad to see grown-up people needing somebody to show them how to shop for clothes. It is even more depressing when so many of us decide that we cannot make important decisions concerning our personal life without the benefit of a life coach, parenting coach or a high-tech psychic peddling gemstone therapy. This is not just deference to authority but the prostration of the adult imagination.

Of course, there is nothing wrong with expertise. We rely on mechanics to fix our cars and on dentists to extract our teeth. But the posse of 21st-century life experts is not so much in the business of fixing practical problems as in transforming us into needy children. Their enterprise depends on undermining and usurping confidence in our ability to conduct our affairs. The message they transmit is that normal human beings cannot do it on their own. That is why they assume that they possess the moral authority to dictate to us what to wear, how to love, how to parent, what not to eat and, most important of all, how to live. They are in the business of imposing a new form of authority over people’s everyday affairs. At least the message of self-help gurus in the 1980s and 1990s projected the mildly anarchic ideal of ‘be yourself’. In form at least the message was promoted through an anti-authoritarian vocabulary. In contrast, today’s makeover culture self-consciously commands you not to be yourself. On television they make fun of the way you dress, offer sarcastic references about your poor taste in the way you furnish your home and insist that you follow their superior regime of child-rearing. They know best, which is why some of them describe themselves, without a trace of irony, as gurus.

Deference to the authority of the celebrity, makeover guru or healer is underwritten by the decline in the influence of conventional forms of authority. That is why the frequently asserted claim that we live in an age characterised by the ‘death of deference’ bears little relationship to reality. Yes, it has become fashionable to treat traditional forms of authority — monarchy, church, parliament — with derision. Criticism of traditional institutions has become so prevalent that it bears all the hallmarks of classical conformism. Scientists, doctors and other professionals have also experienced an erosion of authority. But the diminishing influence of conventional authority has been paralleled by the rise of a new ‘alternative’ one. We don’t trust politicians but we have faith in the pronouncements of celebrities. We are suspicious of medical doctors but we feel comfortable with healers who mumble on about being ‘holistic’ and ‘natural’. We certainly don’t trust scientists working for the pharmaceutical industry but we are happy to listen to the disinterested opinion of a herbalist. And, of course, alternative food and other consumer products gain our confidence because ...they are alternative.

Confused parents are now expected to bow to the expertise of the supernanny who has succeeded in taming their naughty children. Disoriented adults now swear that their detox therapist has freed them from their negative feelings. Others are reluctant to make their next big decision without the ‘support’ of their life coach. The whole nation hails the celebrity saint who has alerted them to the moral challenge of purifying children’s school dinners. Our saints do not simply save individuals, but the entire continent of Africa.

According to traditional political theory, the free and self-reliant citizen should fear the state because, unchecked, it’s voracious appetite will ultimately assume control over all aspects of public and private life and turn him into a slave no longer permitted to make the free choices that define his dignity and guide his destiny. How ironic that our modern society appears to accord us more and more free choices while haranguing us daily about how incompetent we are to make them.

Posted by Peter Burnet at November 23, 2005 6:42 AM
Comments

I've never actually met anyone who has a 'life coach' or a 'detox therapist', so I couldn't comment on their supposedly increasing prevalence.

However, I have observed that we have on our TV screens a whole load of daft 'troubleshooter' reality programmes where 'supernannies' help out dysfunctional families, dieticians ruthlessly 'coach' fatties etc.

If, as I suspect, this is the phenomenon that Mr Furedi is talking about, then I think he might miss the point. People don't like those TV programmes because they themselves wish to be coached, but because they enjoy the schandenfreude of hopeless cases being bullied and yelled at by know-it-all bossy-boots.

Much in the same way that people watch Jerry Springer not because they identify with the problems, but because they like gawping at a freakshow.

Posted by: Brit at November 23, 2005 7:02 AM

I also doubt the newness of this "phenomenon". The rich have always had hired help, servants basically.

Posted by: Perry at November 23, 2005 8:31 AM

Seems like someone's been ripping off Moliere.

Time to dust off "Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme."

Posted by: Barry Meislin at November 23, 2005 9:02 AM

Furedi forgot to add "parents" in his list of authority figures.

I've watched Supernanny on a couple of occasions and kept wondering what did your parents tell you to do, you idiot?

Posted by: Sandy P at November 23, 2005 9:24 AM

Just another variation on the Nanny Theme. Now coming to your neighborhood cradle-to-grave. Is the underlying infantilism cause or effect?

Posted by: ghostcat at November 23, 2005 11:51 AM

Furedi is overdoing his point. Life Coaching may be on the rise, but its mainly a fad of the well to to, as they're the only ones who can afford them. As with modern religion, this is a pull, not a push, form of authority. We choose our authority figures now, they aren't imposed on us.

Everyone likes to think of himself as an independently minded individualist, but noone really likes to leave the comfort of the herd. This article from yesterday's WSJ explains it pretty well.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at November 24, 2005 4:10 PM
« ROBBER BARONS | Main | HAPPY NEW YEAR, DEMOCRATS: »