November 5, 2005

THEY CAN'T MAKE THEMSELVES ETHNICALLY FRENCH:

WHY PARIS IS BURNING (AMIR TAHERI, 11/04/05, NY Post)

Within hours, the original cause of the incidents was forgotten and the issue jelled around a demand by the representatives of the rioters that the French police leave the "occupied territories." By midweek, the riots had spread to three of the provinces neighboring Paris, with a population of 5.5 million.

But who lives in the affected areas? In Clichy itself, more than 80 percent of the inhabitants are Muslim immigrants or their children, mostly from Arab and black Africa. In other affected towns, the Muslim immigrant community accounts for 30 percent to 60 percent of the population. But these are not the only figures that matter. Average unemployment in the affected areas is estimated at around 30 percent and, when it comes to young would-be workers, reaches 60 percent.

In these suburban towns, built in the 1950s in imitation of the Soviet social housing of the Stalinist era, people live in crammed conditions, sometimes several generations in a tiny apartment, and see "real French life" only on television.

The French used to flatter themselves for the success of their policy of assimilation, which was supposed to turn immigrants from any background into "proper Frenchmen" within a generation at most.

That policy worked as long as immigrants came to France in drips and drops and thus could merge into a much larger mainstream. Assimilation, however, cannot work when in most schools in the affected areas, fewer than 20 percent of the pupils are native French speakers.

France has also lost another powerful mechanism for assimilation: the obligatory military service abolished in the 1990s.

As the number of immigrants and their descendants increases in a particular locality, more and more of its native French inhabitants leave for "calmer places," thus making assimilation still more difficult.

In some areas, it is possible for an immigrant or his descendants to spend a whole life without ever encountering the need to speak French, let alone familiarize himself with any aspect of the famous French culture.

The result is often alienation. And that, in turn, gives radical Islamists an opportunity to propagate their message of religious and cultural apartheid.

Some are even calling for the areas where Muslims form a majority of the population to be reorganized on the basis of the "millet" system of the Ottoman Empire: Each religious community (millet) would enjoy the right to organize its social, cultural and educational life in accordance with its religious beliefs.

In parts of France, a de facto millet system is already in place.


Mr. Taheri misses the main point: there is no French culture left for them to be assimilated into.

MORE:
Paris When It Sizzles: The intifada comes to France. (Olivier Guitta, 11/14/2005, Weekly Standard)

Some intellectuals speak of the Lebanonization of French society. Others speculate about civil war in ten years if nothing is done. Michel Gurfinkiel, editor of the news magazine Valeurs Actuelles, likens France today to the Weimar republic just before the rise of Nazism.

Interior Minister Sarkozy wants to turn a new leaf. He expresses determination to end the laissez-faire attitude toward the pathologies of the "banlieues sensibles" that has prevailed for decades, under governments of both left and right, with the possible exception of his own previous stint as interior minister, in 2002-04. Facing down rock throwers in Argenteuil, another hotspot, last week, he vowed to rid the suburbs of the "racaille."

Sarkozy has been widely criticized for using that term, even by members of his own party, who accuse him of adding fuel to the fire. Much hangs on the success of his Giuliani-like "zero tolerance" approach. As of now, he seems to be the only politician willing to tackle the thorny issues of immigration and security. Soon enough, French voters will have a chance to render their verdict on his policies: The current frontrunner in the presidential election of 2007 is none other than Sarkozy.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 5, 2005 6:44 AM
Comments

Sarkozy is playing a waiting game, as he must. But the French will probably wait until he is too old to take vigorous action, before turning to him. Already he is being blamed for the riots, because of comments he made after they were in full swing. This is French 'logic' at work defending the entrenched nomenklatura - 'let's all get behind the same narrative, no matter how absurd it is on its face'.

Like their friends the Palestinians, the French 'never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity'. In this sense they and their Muslim rabble deserve each other.

Posted by: ZF at November 5, 2005 9:01 AM

Normally, ZF I would indulge in some schadenfruede. Except France has a lot of nuclear power stations and nuclear weapons, and I don't want chaos going through that relatively small country when that kind of stuff is lying around.

Posted by: Mikey at November 5, 2005 10:45 AM
« MS KIRKPATRICK HAS WON: | Main | NEVERMIND: »