November 8, 2005
PARIS BURNING:
Riots in France (Michael Balter, 11/08/05)
Last Saturday evening, my wife and I had dinner in a restaurant overlooking the St. Martin Canal, just a short walk from the Parisian neighborhood where we have lived for the past 15 years. As we left, we were greeted by the acrid smell of burning rubber from cars that had been set alight near the Place de la Republique nearby. We were not surprised. Everyone in Paris knew that the riots would not remain confined to the city’s impoverished suburbs for long. The center of Paris was too tempting a target for the gangs of youths now rampaging in dozens of French cities. Bringing the riots to the center of French government power was the next logical step.As I write, early on Tuesday morning, the riots have continued for 12 straight nights, despite increasing law and order talk from the conservative French government and the mobilization of nearly 10,000 local and national police. The current situation is the logical and predictable result of neglecting the plight of the the ghettoized communities that ring Paris, especially to the north and east. Here, in bleak, often run down housing projects, immigrants from North and sub-Saharan Africa—some newcomers, many here for several generations—suffer from 30-40% employment rates, inferior schools, and minimal social services. They also suffer from the ingrained racism of a French society that has always regarded them as outsiders and perhaps always will.
To understand what is going on in France requires keeping two or more contradictory thoughts in one’s head at the same time. The rioters are not freedom fighters, revolutionaries, or community activists. The chief instigators are the hoodlum elements that have long plagued these poor suburbs, making the lives of their own neighbors insecure and miserable. On the weekends, they plague public transportation, sometimes attacking passengers and otherwise making a nuisance of themselves. On the other hand, there are no hoodlum gangs in the wealthy districts of western Paris. When a young man has no job and no money, being a hoodlum and/or a drug dealer is pretty much all that is left as a vocation. So while the torching of cars, schools, and businesses is unacceptable and inexcusable, it is easily understandable. And from an entirely symbolic point of view, these actions have a certain resonance: In France as in America, the automobile, the rioters’ chief target, is a symbol of freedom, mobility, and independence—something that these young people have never had and may never have. More than 5,000 autos have now been torched, a symbolic statement indeed.
They can surely be forgiven hating cars.
MORE:
Why Paris is burning (Ehsan Ahrari, 11/09/05, Asia Times)
The question remains, why is Paris burning?Posted by Orrin Judd at November 8, 2005 5:22 PMThe answer goes to a detailed description of the hypocrisy of French political culture, which gleefully depicts itself as too civilized, too secular and too "sophisticated" to nurture hostility or animus toward any ethnic group or religion, including Islam. The reality, alas, is quite the contrary.
The demonstrators, to be sure, are young men, mostly of North African origin. Almost all of them are second- or even third-generation Frenchmen, but that depiction remains only in the government record of birth certificates. For the blue-eyed, blonde-haired French, all those young people of North African origin will always be "Africans" or "Arabs", words that manifest their not so latent disdain.
"So while the torching of cars, schools, and businesses is unacceptable and inexcusable, it is easily understandable."
Actually, it's not really. So much for the hope that the left will ever abandon such thinly disguised racist drivel.
Also, I'm sure Mr. Balter just inadvertantly left out "churches" from the list of arson targets.
Posted by: b at November 8, 2005 5:50 PMThey don't hate cars, they hate people who have cars. Pretty sure there's a lesson in there somewhere.
Posted by: joe shropshire at November 8, 2005 5:56 PMOJ,
They'll start in on trains just as soon as they can.
Posted by: Brandon at November 8, 2005 5:58 PMoj: What percentage of the ghetto (there's a humorous term in this context...) population is taking part in the violence?
Posted by: b at November 8, 2005 6:02 PMThe percentage is irrelevant. The actual rioters will never be high. Most people duck for cover when these things happen.
These outbreaks of violence occur generally whenever there is large population of young men with free time who have a high deal of resentment. They indulge in violence when there's something they can use an excuse and the traditional system of law and order is absent.
Doesn't matter if it's 1930's Germany (unemployed and angry over Versailles and a police force sympathetic to right wing thugs), late 1960's America (free time in college and disillusioned over race and Vietnam War draft and a judicial system excusing such behavior) or 1970's Iran (unemployed and angry over corruption with police losing faith in their own govt).
Posted by: Chris Durnell at November 8, 2005 6:13 PMWhat kind of person hates freedom, mobility and independence, what kind if person hates cars?
Posted by: Lou Gots at November 8, 2005 7:52 PMAnd yes, they are killing people.
Posted by: joe shropshire at November 8, 2005 8:06 PMThey are not torching their own cars, only those which do not have a clingy of africa or koranic statement on them...............
Boy, some poster somewhere already pegged it, frogistan's conservative gov't.
Posted by: Sandy P at November 8, 2005 9:47 PMAs an aside, How many American neighborhoods would allow these gangs to operate with such impunity?
The LA riots are instructive. Some places were so bad off that no one did much, while other people banded together, armed themselves, and protected their neighborhoods.
I seem to remember that the police did not perform well.
Maybe I'm pollyannish, but 10-15 reasonably fit 40 somethings with rebar and baseball bats could make short work of 10-20 moronic rampaging youth.
But then, I'm not French - so I wouldn't understand.
Posted by: Bruno at November 8, 2005 10:37 PMA person killed in national rioting? We lost that many after the Red Sox won.
Posted by: oj at November 8, 2005 11:41 PMFor the blue-eyed, blonde-haired French
Asia Times, always good for a laugh. (Of course, the frequent German visits will have left a bit of a legacy.)
Posted by: Daran at November 9, 2005 4:21 AM