November 27, 2005
PAGING DAVID CAMERON (via Robert Schwartz):
Brussels publishes list of first seven pan-European crimes (Anthony Browne, 11/24/05, Times of London)
The ruling means that for the first time in legal history, a British government and Parliament will no longer have the sovereign right to decide what constitutes a crime and what the punishment should be.The highly controversial announcement, made possible by a European Court of Justice ruling in September, would represent a huge transfer of power from national capitals to the EU. At present member states jealously guard their right to decide what constitutes a criminal offence, and when their citizens should be fined, imprisoned or given criminal records.
The Commission suggested several other offences, including racial discrimination and intellectual property theft, which could become European crimes in the future. It will also set out the level of penalty, such as length of prison sentence, that would apply to each crime.
The announcement is strongly opposed by Britain and many other member states. The Commission is using powers granted by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, the EU’s supreme court, and governments fear that there is little they can do to prevent it. The court ruled that the EU had the right to require member states to create criminal offences, and could dictate the length of prison sentences.
The case before the court in September applied only to environmental law, but the Commission says it means that it can create criminal penalties to enforce the entire body of EU law. A Commission statement said that the court’s reasoning can be applied “to all Community policies and freedoms which involve binding legislation with which criminal penalties should be associated in order to ensure their effectiveness”.
The Tories can break Labour, Europe or both if they use this well. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 27, 2005 8:59 AM
>i> and governments fear that there is little they can do to prevent it.
Put another way, if England ignores the EU courts, there is little that the EU can do to enforce it.
There is a lot that national governments can do, namely pull out of the EU. This idiocy is not some sort of irresistible force, they can regain their sovereignty at any point they wish to. The question is whether they have the desire to.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at November 27, 2005 10:51 AMAnd the guts.
Posted by: jim hamlen at November 27, 2005 12:19 PMI can't understand why no mainstream politician in Britain will take this kind of thing on front and center. Brit?
Posted by: Peter B at November 27, 2005 2:54 PMI thought that the proposed EU federal constitution had failed after the referenda in France and Netherlands. I guess the folks in Brussels are not going to let that little detail stop them.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at November 27, 2005 6:30 PMNo different, Robert, than the DemoRats in Washington State. An election means nothing to them - they just want their power.
Posted by: obc at November 27, 2005 9:17 PMThought Experiment: if immigrant rioters in Belgium attack the European Parliament, who gets called as a first responder? And what if a member state decides to bomb the place?
Posted by: jim hamlen at November 28, 2005 11:46 AM