November 16, 2005
KNOCKING DOWN STRAW-HEADED MEN (via Tom Corcoran)
Do-It-Yourself Legislation: A legislative disease the GOP is far from immune to. (Iain Murray, 11/16/05, National Review)
The aftermath of hurricanes Katrina and Rita have proved a massive breeding ground for what former OECD Chief Economist David Henderson has termed "Do-it-Yourself Economics" (DIYE), which he defines as "firmly held intuitive economic ideas and beliefs which owe little or nothing to textbooks, treatises or the evidence of economic history." The DIYE phenomenon is not restricted to the general public. Henderson points out that DIYE ideas are "sincerely held, and voiced with conviction, by political figures, top civil servants, CEOs, [labor unionists], well-known journalists and commentators, religious leaders, senior judges and eminent professors." Sadly, these ideas might do real harm to the U.S. economy.
A sterling example comes from the august pages of the New York Times, which recently editorialized in favor of a tax on gas to keep the price at $3. The reason for keeping the price high, the Times asserts, is twofold: to defund the paymasters of terrorism in the Middle East and to combat global warming. A moment's thought shows that the Times should realize that artificially raising the price of gas will not hurt rich Salafi ideologues but native communities in Alaska and oil-rich developing economies of the third world. In a world of falling demand caused by high gas prices, it is those who produce gas the cheapest — the Saudis and their friends — who will continue to sell it.
Hardly surprising that the Times would argue bad reasons for a good idea. Raising gas taxes -- and offsetting them -- would create disincentives for gas use and economic incentives for innovating alternatives and would begin transitioning us from income taxes to consumption taxes. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 16, 2005 4:02 PM
No, it wouldn't. It would make the economy smaller though, for the simple reason that the offsetting would never happen. Find a way to do the offsetting first and you might have something. On second thought just do the offsetting and then leave well enough alone. Wait a minute, we already did that.
Posted by: joe shropshire at November 16, 2005 4:16 PMjoe:
It's an inane argument. We've never had trouble offsetting tax changesa, as witness the Reagan reform of the second term.
Posted by: oj at November 16, 2005 4:27 PMMistuh Reagan, he dead. This crew is not going to offset anything, they're too busy peeing themselves.
Posted by: joe shropshire at November 16, 2005 9:49 PMThen you just veto it. This stuff isn't particularly hard.
Posted by: oj at November 16, 2005 9:54 PMWhat's a veto?
Posted by: joe shropshire at November 16, 2005 9:54 PMBy the way, that's not a good answer. The Bush tax cuts all have sunsets, they'll require an internal skeleton of some kind among congressional Republicans to be made permanent. Let me know how that search is going.
Posted by: joe shropshire at November 16, 2005 9:58 PM