November 26, 2005

JUST STAY IN ONE PLACE AND EVENTUALLY THEY REVOLVE AROUND YOU:

U.S. Starts Laying Groundwork for Significant Troop Pullout From Iraq (Paul Richter and Tyler Marshall, November 26, 2005, LA Times)

Even as debate over the Iraq war continues to rage, signs are emerging of a convergence of opinion on how the Bush administration might begin to exit the conflict.

In a departure from previous statements, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said this week that the training of Iraqi soldiers had advanced so far that the current number of U.S. troops in the country probably would not be needed much longer.

President Bush will give a major speech Wednesday at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., in which aides say he is expected to herald the improved readiness of Iraqi troops, which he has identified as the key condition for pulling out U.S. forces.

The administration's pivot on the issue...


So opinion is converging exactly where the President was all along?

MORE:
Iraqi forces coming along, slowly (Pamela Hess, Oct 22, 2005, AP)

It is widely accepted among American officers in Iraq that the U.S. military lost more than a year in Iraq between the invasion and the creation of a professional security force. Thousands were recruited in the months after the fall of Saddam Hussein, but their training was brief and in many cases non-existent. They weren`t screened for loyalty to the old regime, and pay problems persisted.

Twin uprisings in Najaf and Fallujah in April 2004 revealed their vulnerability. About half of those called on to fight refused or abandoned their posts, and at least 10 percent joined the other side.

That searing experience led to the appointment of Army Lt. Gen. David Petraeus to oversee the creation of new Iraqi security forces. With considerable reorganization, partnering American units with Iraqi units, assigning thousands of U.S. military exclusively to training assignments, creating formal military academies, the Iraqi army is now showing signs of progress. The November 2004 battle for Fallujah, half of which was handled by Iraqi forces, proved the case. With adequate training and strong backing -- as well as medical, logistical and fire support -- Iraqi forces are now capable of shouldering some of the mission.

According to the U.S. military, some 116 Iraqi battalions are now in the fight; either in the lead, planning and carrying out operations against insurgents with U.S. backing, or as partners in U.S. planned raids and battles. In October the first Iraqi division headquarters assumed command of two brigades under it, and they have security responsibility for central Baghdad.

'If you demonstration what you want them to do, they do it,\' said Lt. Col. Mark Meadows, commander of the 1st Squadron, 71st Cavalry Regiment of the 10th Mountain Divisions 1st Brigade Combat Team. \'They copy very, very well. The good guys will keep doing it.'

Only one Iraqi battalion -- a force of about 700 -- is capable of totally independent operations, from planning to execution, as well as providing their own housing, food and transportation, according to the top American general in Iraq.

According to one Iraqi general, Iraq is just a year away from having a proper army if only the insurgency and its daily attacks on Iraqi infrastructure can be brought under control.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 26, 2005 10:05 AM
Comments

A different way of putting it is that 1 battalion is better than most European military formations.

Posted by: JAB at November 26, 2005 11:18 AM

No batallion, in any armed force, ours included, is capable of "independent operations."

Traditionally, independent operations are the province of the army corps, a much higher echelon. In modern terms, operations involve much joint support, including national assets, by which is meant high-tech intel.

Quare, are the batallions "operating independently" without air, armor, artillery, non-organic transport and more than a day or two of supply? Don't even ask about the high-tech business.

Of course, well-led, well-trained Iraqis will raise good batallions; they will need much more that that.

Posted by: Lou Gots at November 26, 2005 1:26 PM

Lou: Nobody objects to our supplying the quartermasters and the air support, so long as only Iraqis are getting killed.

Posted by: David Cohen at November 26, 2005 4:11 PM

David, terrorists are still killing Israelis after half a century. If occasional terrorism casulties can get us out, we had better send off to Berlitz tapes for the Atrabic tapes right now and save all the fuss.

Posted by: Lou Gots at November 26, 2005 4:44 PM
« DON'T HEAR MUCH ABOUT BUSHENOMICS: | Main | AMERICA'S SECRET--CONFORMIST DIVERSITY: »