November 8, 2005

ISN'T IT AN ANTI-PRINCIPLE?

Founding principle called into question (Jon Henley, November 8, 2005, The Guardian)

The government cannot admit it, but more and more voices in France are being raised to say that the country's worst urban unrest since the student uprising of 1968 reflects the failure of a whole model.
"The crisis is total," one leading sociologist, Michel Wievorka, said yesterday. "This is a structural problem that neither the right nor the left have dealt with for 25 years. France cannot cope with the shortcomings of its republican model. The whole system needs to be rethought."

The modèle républicain d'intégration is based on perhaps the most sacred article of all France's grand republican creed: that everyone is equal and indistinguishable in the eyes of the state. No matter where they come from, all French citizens are identical in their Frenchness.

It is a fine principle born of the ideals of the 1789 revolution. But it has practical drawbacks. [...]

The integrationist approach worked for earlier waves of European immigrants from Poland, Spain, Italy and Portugal. But they were white and Catholic, and arrived when France needed labour.


Gee, there are practical problems to trying to build a society without common beliefs?

MORE:
Civil Unrest in France Enters 12th NightCivil (Jocelyn GECKER, 11/07/05, Associated Press)

France will impose curfews under a state-of-emergency law and call up police reservists to stop rioting that has spread out of Paris' suburbs and into nearly 300 cities and towns across the country, the prime minister said Monday, calling a return to order "our No. 1 responsibility."

The tough new measures came as France's worst civil unrest in decades entered a 12th night, with rioters in the southern city of Toulouse setting fire to a bus after sundown and pelting police with gasoline bombs and rocks.


Posted by Orrin Judd at November 8, 2005 12:14 AM
Comments

We should not overlook the didactic excellence of a thousand or more years of public executions, not to mention drawings and quarterings and breaking on the wheel, as a builder of shared civilization.

The C-J's* simple don't take Western law seriously because they don't see it seriously enforced.

Posted by: Lou Gots at November 8, 2005 8:04 AM

Must be one of those post-modern definitions of "civil".

Posted by: Mikey at November 8, 2005 8:29 AM

all French citizens are identical in their Frenchness.

Which is?

Posted by: Gideon at November 8, 2005 12:17 PM

Gideon: A disdain for any thing or anyone not Gallic.

Lou: Forgive me but what is meant by C-J's? I've apparently missed a few posts.

Posted by: Bartman at November 8, 2005 12:44 PM

Rhymes with "framelwhockeys."

Posted by: joe shropshire at November 8, 2005 5:11 PM

Does anyone else laugh out loud when reading these comments? Rhymes with "framelwhockeys." Indeed it does.

Posted by: erp at November 8, 2005 5:25 PM
« YOU DON'T GET CREDIT FOR WINS, ONLY BLAME FOR LOSSES: | Main | COLLECTED: »