November 10, 2005
FUTURE GENERATIONS ARE AN UNNECESSARY INCONVENIENCE...:
At Center of a Clash, Rowdy Children in Coffee Shops (JODI WILGOREN, 11/09/05, NY Times)
Bridget Dehl shushed her 21-month-old son, Gavin, then clapped a hand over his mouth to squelch his tiny screams amid the Sunday brunch bustle. When Gavin kept yelping "yeah, yeah, yeah," Ms. Dehl whisked him from his highchair and out the door.Right past the sign warning the cafe's customers that "children of all ages have to behave and use their indoor voices when coming to A Taste of Heaven," and right into a nasty spat roiling the stroller set in Chicago's changing Andersonville neighborhood. [...]
[M]any neighborhood mothers took umbrage at the implied criticism of how they handle their children. Soon, whispers of a boycott passed among the playgroups in this North Side neighborhood, once an outpost of avant-garde artists and hip gay couples but now a hot real estate market for young professional families shunning the suburbs.
It's a classic Blue vs Red battle: gays vs families. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 10, 2005 8:47 PM
"whispers of a boycott passed among the playgroups in this North Side neighborhood..."I love people who don't have children who tell you how to parent," said Alison Miller, 35, a psychologist, corporate coach and mother of two."
This is in response to a sign stating children need to behave. What narcisscism. You can bet that if her little angels did act up in the coffee shop (or anywhere else) she wouldn't yell at them (let alone smack them) either because that might damage the kiddies self esteem.
Posted by: carter at November 10, 2005 9:40 PMWhy don't they just pass out sedatives along with the muffins and sweet rolls?
Posted by: ratbert at November 10, 2005 9:42 PMWhich is why on winged busses (or any public transportation) children should be put in kennels and checked as baggage with all the other pets.
Being a parent is such a common thing that anyone who can't recognize a bad one probably needs a degree in Psychology. I'm sure Miller has no problem, as a "corporate coach", judging other people's job performance despite her lack of experience in their job.
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at November 10, 2005 10:16 PMGood point Raoul. And I'm willing to wager that when Ms. Miller's children act up in public (as you know they must as she's so sensitive about it) it's while she's babbling on a cell phone instead of minding them.
Posted by: carter at November 10, 2005 10:41 PMwhen on planes, or in restaurants i don't worry if other people are unhappy about my kids making too much noise. for some reason, being large and scary looking inhibits wormy types from voicing their complaints. sucks to be them i guess.
Posted by: a dad at November 10, 2005 11:21 PMAh, those wacky corporate coaches. I myself had some exposure to a corporate coach a couple of years ago. She showed up to (badly) facilitate a couple of senior management meetings, and was then mysteriously hired into the operations group, where she turned out to be THE WORST CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER EVER. What can I say, our group president was an idiot and a cronyist. Shortly thereafter, both he and the "coach" were gone; unfortunately they both received lovely parting gifts, the funding of which was partially covered by the next round of layoffs and plant closings.
Posted by: HT at November 11, 2005 12:10 AMOh boy. Irresistible force meets immovable object. I'm rooting for both sides here. On the one hand, North America's child focus and family friendliness is more precious than most realize. Efforts to segregate kids should be fought. On the other, thanks to Oprah and all the child-rearing gurus, we're raising a generation of little terrorists. In the end, you have to choose between spanking and excluding.
Posted by: Peter B at November 11, 2005 6:12 AMPurely anecdotal, but when I was a kid and I acted out in public, I was removed quite quickly for a private discussion with one of the parental units.
She did the right thing, she left and took the kid outside.
Posted by: Mikey at November 11, 2005 7:50 AMWhy are gay couples always descibed as "hip"? Every gay or lesbian that I've ever known was dowdy, overweight or balding.
Posted by: Brandon at November 11, 2005 9:55 AMWhen are they going to ban Ashleigh Banfield style eyeglasses?
Posted by: RC at November 11, 2005 10:13 AMChildren - especially toddlers - are going to act up. A certain amount is understandable.
However, it seems to me that many parents do not discipline their children, and those children lack the self-control that should be expected. Furthermore, it is very insulting to your fellow customers if the child acts up and the parent does nothing.
Simply posting a sign that requests children behave does not seem offensive to me. That certain people say it implies that they are bad parents seems one of those denials that are actually self-admissions. They probably know they are bad parents at one level and are therefore touchy about it.
If some customers prefer the "family friendly" place and others like the new atmosphere at the other, it seems both sides win. Move on.
Posted by: Chris Durnell at November 11, 2005 10:52 AMBrandon:
Because queerness is transgressive of social norms.
Posted by: oj at November 11, 2005 12:03 PMI agree with Mikey, the mother in this story did the right thing this time - but that it was necessary to take the child outside shows that she has not done the right thing on many previous occasions.
Finally, a topic where I can speak from experience.
Posted by: flanman at November 11, 2005 1:15 PMdo family friendly restaurants have a sign that says "only well behaved dogs, in strollers allowed" ? just asking...
Posted by: alfred kinsley at November 11, 2005 5:00 PMI think it's more Blues vs. Blues than Blues vs. Reds. Probably more "Reds" than "Blues" believe in good old-fashioned discipline.
Posted by: Emilia Liz at November 25, 2005 6:51 PM