November 7, 2005

DEATH THROES:

CRISIS OF FAITH IN THE MUSLIM WORLD: PART 2: The Islamist response (Spengler, 11/08/05, Asia Times)

As Phillip Longman wrote in The Empty Cradle, "Faith is increasingly necessary as a motivation to have children." The collapse of traditional society has brought about a collapse of birth rates across cultures. Cultures that fail to reproduce themselves by definition are failed cultures, for the simple reason that they will cease to exist before many generations have passed.

That is why the Islamists - Muslims who seek a new theocracy - display a sense of extreme urgency. They are not conservative Muslims, for they reject Muslim society as it exists as corrupt and decadent. They are revolutionaries who want to create a new kind of totalitarian theocracy that orders every detail of human life. They are not throwbacks to the past, but products of modern education. Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966), the founder of the modern Islamist movement, formulated his theory while earning a master's degree in education at the Colorado State College of Education. He wrote in 1949:

Islamic society today is not Islamic in any sense of the word ... In our modern society we do not judge by what Allah has revealed; the basis of our economic life is usury; our laws permit rather than punish oppression ... We permit the extravagance and the luxury that Islam prohibits; we allow the starvation and the destitution of which the Messenger once said: "Whenever people anywhere allow a man to go hungry, they are outside the protection of Allah, the Blessed and the Exalted."

The Islamists feel that they have nothing to lose, for the fear of cultural extinction surpasses the fear of physical death. The Islamist dream of theocracy, for example, Osama bin Laden's vision of a restored caliphate, represents what might be the last stand of an endangered culture, something like the Nazi hallucination of Aryan empire. The Islamists have nothing to lose, but they have much to gain: they perceive not only weakness, but also opportunity. Islamic life is dying, but far more slowly than the senile civilization of Western Europe.


It is, of course, an existential struggle, but not one they can win. Islamicism will fare no better than communism and Nazism before it and for the same reasons.

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 7, 2005 10:17 AM
Comments

unfortunately, tens of/hundreds of millions of people will die proving this ideology wrong.

Posted by: Sandy P at November 7, 2005 11:00 AM

They CAN win if WE concede!!

France is in the process of conceding, and we were just 100,000 Ohio voters away from electing a French President.

Concession is preached in our schools, Mainline Churches, MSM, and virtually the entire not-for-profit NGO sector.

I appreciate your optimism, but things are NOT as bright as they seem.

...

As an aside, how many French citizens have guns?

Posted by: Bruno at November 7, 2005 12:03 PM

The observation concerning Islamism going the way of Nazism and Communism, and for the same reason, is most apt. This is what used to be called, "contradictions."

There is a tendency to idealize the efficiency of the Nazis. In truth, at the national level, they were a gang who couldn't shoot straight. Such successes as they enjoyed were due to a legacy of military virtue which they inherited and squandered.

The Communists, of course, did even worse. Again, political control of both the economy and of the military resulted in disaster.

The C-J's don't even have the residual strengths which the earlier totalitarians squandered. Ruthless is only a temporary asset, only useful until one's opponent rouses to the neccessity of fighting terror with superior terror.

All they have is the hope that our squeamishness will translate into limitless forbearance. They should go back and ask the Germans and the Japanese, who knew us.

Posted by: Lou Gots at November 7, 2005 3:06 PM

Sandy:

Hardly, you have to control governments to run extermination camps.

Posted by: oj at November 7, 2005 11:22 PM

Bruno:

Pish-posh. Put Kerry in office and you'd have the same foreign policy but with popular support.

Posted by: oj at November 7, 2005 11:35 PM
« FORGET SCIENCE, ARGUE SOUL: | Main | IT'S A PROCESS: »