October 8, 2005
WHY CAN'T WE BE FRIENDS:
A Love That Was Benched by Their Careers: The long-standing relationship between high court nominee Harriet Miers and Texas jurist Nathan Hecht entrances and puzzles their friends. (Scott Gold and Richard A. Serrano, October 8, 2005, LA Times)
[F]or 30 years, Hecht and Miers — President Bush's Supreme Court nominee — have nurtured a kinship that has entranced and confounded their closest friends. They are traditional conservatives content in a modern, nontraditional relationship, one that leaves plenty of time for their true love, their work, to take center stage.Posted by Orrin Judd at October 8, 2005 12:00 AMRomantic at times, the relationship has played an important role in their ascent to power — she as White House counsel, he as a justice of the Texas Supreme Court, where he has served for 15 years.
"I think they thought seriously about getting married," said Dallas commercial litigation attorney Brady Sparks, who lived across the hall from Hecht in law school and has been friends with Hecht and Miers ever since. "They both decided that it just wasn't in the cards for the agenda they both wanted, and that was to do about three lifetimes worth of work in one lifetime."
The Rev. Ron Key, their pastor, said God called him to preach, not to play matchmaker. He said that in his long career as a minister, theirs was the only relationship that had ever tempted him to intervene.
This takes a load from my mind. Before this, the nominee's biography had allowed the suggestion that this was a two-fer appointment.
Posted by: Lou Gots at October 8, 2005 11:43 AMSounds like rather quaint Victorianism to me. What's the problem?
Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at October 9, 2005 12:27 AMLou Gots:
I would think that a lesbian with a long-time partner would be more mainstream than a workaholic who can't be bothered with a spouse, much less children.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen
at October 9, 2005 7:21 AM
