October 11, 2005
THE FIRST HARRIET MIERS MOMENT (via mc):
'No Child' Closes the Gap: Harder for Special Needs, Low-Income Students to be Left Behind (Jay Mathews, 10/11/05, Washington Post)
Ricki Sabia began volunteering to help children with disabilities when she was in high school on Long Island. She went to college at Georgetown University and law school at the University of Maryland. When her second son, Stephen, was born in 1992 with Down syndrome, her youthful interest became a major focus of her life. She tried to do what she could to improve services for children with disabilities in Montgomery County, where she lived with Stephen, her older son David and her husband Peter, a cardiologist.It was often a struggle and led her to appreciate an unexpected ally, the federal No Child Left Behind law.
NCLB was not very popular with educators, particularly those whose schools were threatened with unattractive labels if their special education students did not reach the annual achievement targets under the law. But for Sabia, now associate director of the National Down Syndrome Society Public Policy Center, and other parents the law was an effective tool precisely because it forced educators to try to do difficult things that, before the law, they could easily let slide. NCLB slaps a "needs improvement" label on a school, and forces it to let students transfer and get them special tutoring if any of its student subgroups, including low-income children or children with disabilities, do not improve at the rate prescribed by the law and state authorities. [...]
To those who say the law requires children with disabilities to take tests they cannot pass and forces them out of school...
Those, including most on the Right, haven't understood the genius of the law. What it does is use kids who can't possibly pass the test to make it so that all kids can choose their own schools. Once the voucher provision is amended to allow for private and parochial school attendance a complete voucherization of public education will have been effected. Posted by Orrin Judd at October 11, 2005 1:03 PM
Five years into the Bush admin, all with Republican-dominated Congress, the number of kids with vouchers is less than 1%.
With this kind of genius, who knows who the guy might appoint to the SCOTUS next. It would certainly be a healing moment to appoint his friend Teddy. OJ would find a way to be wild about that, too.
Posted by: Palmcroft at October 11, 2005 1:19 PMTeddy opposes vouchers--he realized too late what he'd done.
But most public schools are pretty good and where they aren't most parents don't care enough to move their kids--no more that about 10% of students are ever likely to choose vouchers.
Posted by: oj at October 11, 2005 1:32 PMAll schools are parochial. Atheism is a religion
Posted by: Genecis at October 11, 2005 6:29 PMWithout someone like Bush in the White House, the road towards vouchers will veer into the swamp (no matter what the law says). Remember the Beck decision.
Does anyone seriously think that McCain, Rudy, or even someone like Bill Frist will go to the wall over vouchers?
Posted by: jim hamlen at October 12, 2005 12:05 AMjim:
Yes. The politicians don't matter, it's where the Third Way is taking everyone.
Posted by: oj at October 12, 2005 1:09 AMMy tone in the first post was rude. I apologize.
Posted by: Palmcroft at October 12, 2005 10:35 AMNo problem, no one expects you to make much sense on this issue.
Posted by: oj at October 12, 2005 11:24 AM