October 3, 2005
PRIVILEGED:
Miers may avert a Senate storm: Democratic leader Harry Reid expresses confidence in her. (Gail Russell Chaddock, 10/04/05, The Christian Science Monitor)
Even more so than John Roberts, recently confirmed as chief justice, Ms. Miers has a short paper trail. While senators have cordial contacts with her as White House counsel, they do not have a fix on her views on hot-button issues ranging from abortion and privacy rights to how widely Congress can regulate the economy based on the commerce clause of the Constitution.Unusually, both Democrats and Republicans say they will press for release of documents during Miers's White House years that will give a clearer view on where she stands on these issues. Since Miers has no record as a judge, senators say the release of relevant documents will be even more important for Miers than it was for Judge Roberts.
"Although the [Bush] administration did not provide the [Judiciary] Committee with files relating to John Roberts's service as Deputy Solicitor General for the United States, we were able to receive from the Reagan Library extensive memoranda and files relating to John Roberts's White House service in the Reagan Administration. The American people are entitled - at a minimum - to the same kind of memoranda and files relating to Ms. Miers," said Sen. Edward Kennedy (D) of Massachusetts, the longest serving member on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Ronald Reagan wasn't just retired by dead, so there was no problem with letting them see his lawyers' files. W, contrary to the wacky Right, is very much alive and president--they'll get bupkus. Posted by Orrin Judd at October 3, 2005 6:15 PM
-- they'll get bupkus.
Que "Bush Whitehouse is Stonewalling" sound bite loop.
Posted by: John Resnick at October 3, 2005 6:38 PMIs it true that her maiden name was Souter?
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at October 4, 2005 1:09 AMI don't think she's been married.
Posted by: Ali Choudhury at October 4, 2005 6:54 AMJust a thought:
how much of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's work for the ACLU was reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee? I have no idea, but as general counsel, I doubt if much of it was ever released (except her public statements and work).
Posted by: jim hamlen at October 5, 2005 12:09 AM