October 19, 2005

IF THE PRESIDENT'S DRIVING, IS IT STILL A HIJACKING?

Cheney 'cabal' hijacked foreign policy (Edward Alden, Financial Times, 10/20/05)

Vice-President Dick Cheney and a handful of others had hijacked the government's foreign policy apparatus, deciding in secret to carry out policies that had left the US weaker and more isolated in the world, the top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell claimed on Wednesday.

In a scathing attack on the record of President George W. Bush, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Mr Powell until last January, said: “What I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made.

What the colonel views as a design flaw actually should be regarded as a feature, as James Mann made clear in Rise of the Vulcans. The colonel is understandably loyal to his boss, Colin Powell, who did lose his share of the foreign policy battles. But Don Rumsfeld was brought in precisely so that Colin Powell would not run roughshod over foreign policy, as James Mann also made clear in his book. That Cheney has proven so influential really only drives home the point that foreign policy in this administration flows from the White House, rather than from cabinet secretaries.

Posted by kevin_whited at October 19, 2005 11:35 PM
Comments

It's not like he isn't an elected official.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at October 20, 2005 12:23 AM

Awwww, those poor, poor people at State, not getting invited to the hot parties of the year. I really feel for them, NOT!

Posted by: Sandy P at October 20, 2005 12:39 AM

OK, how come when I sign in at Typekey, it won't let me post????

Posted by: Sandy P at October 20, 2005 12:40 AM

SandyP: Because you're persona non grata -- just kidding!

Posted by: jd watson [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 20, 2005 4:28 AM

Rumsfeld wanted no part of the war--all it did was disrupt his reorganization plans.

Posted by: oj at October 20, 2005 7:57 AM

“What I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made."

In what bizarro world is this a "scathing attack" rather than the pathetic whining of a career desk jockey?

Posted by: b at October 20, 2005 11:44 AM

This is the same conspiracy theory set in a different location. The "Bush Lied, People Died!" theory wherein the Iraq war was cooked up somewhere (Texas, neocon offices, etc)and foisted on an unsuspecting American public, the proof being that no WMD were found.

The one thing no one ever answers is if it was a conspiracy, why didn't the conspirators plant some WMD's? Sheesh, they would have had to know there weren't any.

Nothing to this story, nothing here. Move on.

Posted by: Mikey at October 20, 2005 1:43 PM

Not a hijacking. It's more like the hostage-taking when the sheriff arrives in Blazing Saddles.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at October 20, 2005 3:43 PM
« PAT'S WONDROUS SHYNESS: | Main | MYTHMATCH--PART II »