October 6, 2005

CHILLING?:

'Chilling' Al Qaeda Memo Obtained (CBS News, Oct. 6, 2005)

The U.S. has obtained a 13-page letter written by Osama bin Laden's deputy, Ayman al Zawahiri, to Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Iraq, outlining with what one senior official calls "chilling clarity" al Qaeda's stretagy for Iraq and beyond, reports CBS News national security correspondent David Martin. [...]

In the letter, Zawahari complains to Zarqawi that some of his violent tactics are hurting public support for al Qaeda's cause, particularly the videotaped beheadings of hostages.

"We don't need this," the letter says. "Use a bullet instead."

Zawahiri also complains about Zarqawi's all-out war against the Shiites of Iraq, saying the Arab man in the street doesn't understand why suicide bombings are killing so many fellow Muslims.

The letter also indicates Zawahiri's life in hiding has left him cut off from news and financial support. He asks Zarqawi to provide him more information about operations in Iraq, saying he should know at least as much as the enemy knows, and he even asks Zarqawi to send money.


chilling? It sounds like their plan is to lose the WoT because they don't understand America, Islam, or humankind in general.

Posted by Orrin Judd at October 6, 2005 9:32 PM
Comments

I guess the focus group surveys are all coming back negative.

Posted by: John at October 6, 2005 11:19 PM

Send money?

Guess that means we've mopped up all of Usama's bank accounts, either that or Abu Musab forgot to pay the quarterly franchise fees.

Posted by: H.D. Miller at October 7, 2005 12:49 AM

Chilling to the honchos at cBS b/c they just realized they've spent four years doubling down on the losing side in Iraq.

Posted by: Jim in Chicago at October 7, 2005 1:24 AM

Under the United Nations Convention of Journalese (2001), all statements issued by terrorist groups must be "chilling."

Similarly, all responses by Bush and Blair must be "determined", and should be delivered whilst standing "shoulder to shoulder."

Responses by Democrats/Lib Dems must be "more measured."

Subsequent interventions by Kofi Annan/The Pope/Nelson Mandela/relative of a soldier killed in action, must be in the form of a "passionate plea", unless it's by a woman, in which case it should also be "heartfelt".

Posted by: Brit at October 7, 2005 5:52 AM

Brit:

Also, it's always a "growing" insurgency (even when it's losing) and you have to work the word "quagmire" in there somewhere.

Posted by: Mike Morley at October 7, 2005 6:15 AM

Chilling alright, if you support Al Qaeda.
I mean all it says is "We're broke, blind, and losing the public opinion war. Your tactics are alienating all of our potential allies.

BTW, did I say we were broke?"

I guess CBS isn't just anti-war, they're on the other side.

Posted by: Mikey at October 7, 2005 7:58 AM

Mikey or anyone:

How does one even read that and think we're the ones who should be chilled?

Posted by: oj at October 7, 2005 8:33 AM

OJ:
Not if you have a basic grasp of English.
And I don't mean typefonts.

Posted by: Mikey at October 7, 2005 9:13 AM

no,no,no .. it's the 'clarity' that is 'chilling'..

the memo's actually a laugh riot!

Posted by: JonofAtlanta at October 7, 2005 10:46 AM
« WHAT OF THE REACTION?: | Main | THE FIRST PARAGRAPH MADE IT SOUND SO EASY »