October 2, 2005
AND A TV AND A PHONE IN EVERY ROOM:
Nowhere to go but up: R.I.P., ranch house. A buildup of new two-stories is changing the landscape. (Judd Slivka, October 2, 2005, LA Times)
THE one-level ranch home, that stalwart of Western living, is being replaced by row after row of closely packed multistory dwellings.Single-story architecture sits right at the confluence of two trends driving the home-building industry: consumer demand for bigger homes and the increasing price of open land.
The near-disappearance of the single-level style in new construction is a milestone in regional land use — a deviation from decades of building that emphasized one-story homes. And one that seems ironic as the large baby boomer population is aging and more likely to be seeking out places without stairs.
About 55% of all new single-family homes in the U.S. had two or more stories in 2004, up from 30% in 1978, according to U.S. Census Bureau statistics. [...]
"Square footage is most important for the buyers from the get-go," said Alma Dizon, a Tarbell Realtors agent in Riverside. "Everyone wants 2,000 square feet as a start, even first-time homeowners. Very few people will sacrifice square footage."
Consumers polled in 2003 were living in homes with a median 1,845 square feet, according to the National Assn. of Home Builders. What they wanted was 2,386 square feet. [...]
Home size has been expanding since the middle of the last century. In 1950, according to home builders' association statistics, the average new American home was 983 square feet. Fast forward to 2003 and the average newly built home was 2,330 square feet.
Let's set aside for the moment the question of whether it's actually true, as the Left and far Right insist, that we work harder than our parents did and we'll just accept that the modern couple works twice as hard. it would hardly be a surprise then that their house is twice as big, eh? Posted by Orrin Judd at October 2, 2005 9:05 AM
And filled with twice as many gadgets and have twice as many cars in garage that's twice as large?
Posted by: H.D. Miller at October 2, 2005 11:00 AMMight be true if you chose to remove the shackles of welfare.
Posted by: obc at October 2, 2005 1:25 PMTwo stories is the way to go if you need cheaper square footage. But--as the baby boomers are experiencing--when your knees start to give out, it's back to a ranch. OTOH, a home elevator only costs $18K.
Posted by: ray at October 2, 2005 4:19 PMRay makes a good point. My wife has arthritis in her knees and hip. We bought a 2nd house in the Phoenix area this year for her (we are separated), and 1 story was a basic requirement. Surprisingly even for Phoenix, the Mecca for 1 story ranch homes, a 1 story house is in the minority of newly constructed homes. The house we got was around 1750 square feet, and was at the bottom of the size range for detached homes.
The amazing thing to ponder is how families got by with 800 sq ft or less back then. We didn't realize how cramped we were, but try to get a modern family with two kids to live in such tight quarters today.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at October 3, 2005 10:35 AMThat's what deflation does.
Posted by: oj at October 3, 2005 10:38 AM