September 15, 2005

THE END OF CIVILIZATION AS WE KNOW IT

Britons accept gas prices of nearly $7 (Thomas Wagner, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, September 14th, 2005)

Peter Welsh, one of many Britons who ignored a call for nationwide fuel price protests Wednesday, figured out long ago how to cope with gasoline that has soared to nearly $7 a gallon - more than twice as much as Americans pay.

He drives a motorbike to work. His wife drives their two children to school in their Alfa Romeo, then returns home and takes public transportation to her government job. Beyond that, their car only gets out of the garage during local drives on weekends.

"OK, rising oil prices are a worldwide problem now. We know that. But in England, about half of what we pay for petrol is a British tax. If the government dropped the price and raised our sales tax or our income tax, we working people would still be hurt, wouldn't we?" said Welsh, 41, who delivers parcels to companies and businesses for the Royal Mail.

Poor enslaved Brits. We North Americans would never compromise our fundamental rights and freedoms by making “working people” budget the use of their Alfa Romeos.

Posted by Peter Burnet at September 15, 2005 5:37 AM
Comments

Darn right!

Posted by: erp at September 15, 2005 7:27 AM

Note that the only reason this works is because the cost of the bus isn't rising with the cost of fuel. So what high gas taxes really accomplish is to push people away from the pump onto subsidized transport.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 15, 2005 7:53 AM

Live on pay per view - OJ and Peter in a steel cage match over gas taxes

Posted by: AWW at September 15, 2005 7:54 AM

David:

Americans also have a bigger car fetish than anyone else. And a bigger walking phobia.

Posted by: Brit at September 15, 2005 8:00 AM

I guess the impending surge in motorcycle fatalities is of no consequence.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at September 15, 2005 8:06 AM

Glad you acknowledged that it is working though David. The invisible hand strikes again.

Posted by: Genecis at September 15, 2005 9:39 AM

Not to worry Jeff. Buy a Hummer ... the full size one ... not those dangerous minis they've introduced.

Posted by: Genecis at September 15, 2005 9:42 AM

Jeff:

Where else will we get organ donors for all those aging boomers?

Posted by: Mike Earl at September 15, 2005 10:33 AM

I ride my bike as much as I can these days. I don't think anybody's gonna want my liver though.

Posted by: joe shropshire at September 15, 2005 10:39 AM

I wish I had the nerve to buy a Hummer. The olive drab one with the very dark tinted windows. It wouldn't fit into the garage is the answer I get when I mention it to my roomie.

Sigh.

Posted by: erp at September 15, 2005 10:46 AM

Bud of mine has a '72 Buick Riviera. Drinks at least as much tasty gasoline as any Hummer.

For extra kicks, here's a french language site dedicated to the '71-'73 models, the "Boattail" Riv's:

http://www.buickriviera71.com/

Posted by: Twn at September 15, 2005 11:28 AM

My liver is also not transferable. I can think of something else that doesn't seem to work as good as it use to.

Posted by: AllenS at September 15, 2005 12:25 PM

erp: I would buy a Humvee, the desert colored one with the TOW missle on the roof.

Posted by: pchuck at September 15, 2005 12:29 PM

When I first met him in 1954, my father-in-law-to-be had a huge 1939 Buick with 12 cylinders. My husband claims that when he was learning to drive, he backed it into a fire hydrant and the fire hydrant took most of the damage.

Ah, the good old days.

Posted by: erp at September 15, 2005 12:31 PM

Desert colored is nice too. TOW missile on the roof? I don't know what it is, but I want one especially if it increases the gas consumption.

Posted by: erp at September 15, 2005 12:36 PM

erp:
A TOW Missile is a wire-guided missile. About 2 miles (I think) of wire goes from it back to the operator, so it's very accurate. Quite handy for destroying tanks or hybrid vehicles with "Impeach Bush!" bumper stickers.
The funny thing is that I can't find anyone (and I work in an environment with lots of former-military types) who can tell me what TOW stands for.

Posted by: Governor Breck at September 15, 2005 12:48 PM

Brit: Darn right.

Genecis: I never denied that it would work. Raise the price of something and cateris parebus demand falls. The question is whether we want to be where higher gas prices would push us. I don't see any benefit worth the cost of getting there. As OJ admits, for him the benefit is aesthetic, and I have a different aesthetic. As for the other arguments, I think it has zero effect on terrorism (when I'm feeling optimistic), that even if the terrorism argument works it boils down to a wistful "Wouldn't it be nice if we could cut and run" and that, because of the same rules of supply and demand discussed above, the ultimate effect on petroleum usage is minimal. Show me where past CAFE increases resulted in lower overall petroleum imports.

If and when a hydrogen economy is economical, it will happen regardless of the amount of federal tax on gasoline.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 15, 2005 12:51 PM

governor: tube-launched, optically-tracked, wire-guided.

Posted by: pcharles at September 15, 2005 12:51 PM

I have a college buddy who is a captain in the USMC and during Gulf War I, he had a bunch of these under his command. He stated that they were extremely lethal to intended targets.

Posted by: pchuck at September 15, 2005 1:13 PM

Gov, pchuck: (self ref alert) In my earlier Army Armored Cav. days, we trained w/ the BGM-71D's (sans warhead of course). They're quite reliable and wickedly accurate. You put the 'X' on what you want to hit and keep it there - whether the target is moving or not - and the missile flys to the X. Once you train out the natural tendancy shift optical focus to the rocket flame in the tail of the missile (instead of maintaining the crosshairs on the target), you simply can't miss.

Posted by: John Resnick at September 15, 2005 1:50 PM

I must be having a dyslexic day. It's even worse than my usual senior moments because I think what I'm reading is the TOW missile when fired goes quick as bunny right to its target trailing about two miles of wire from the launch area on top of the Humvee (the real kind the military uses) to the effete aging hippie's old rusted out Dodge Dart covered in McGovern bumper stickers and reduces it to the kind of treasure trove favored by Palestinian citizen/cum looters.

Is this anywhere near correct?

Posted by: erp at September 15, 2005 1:52 PM

erp: Yes, ma'am. That's about it. (the expendable wire is quite fine and you can shear it after impact or dump the spool case to make your get away). I've only seen first hand what an inert round will do to an already-pounded T-72 tank. So, I can only imagine what the Dart (or the VW bus) would look like.

Posted by: John Resnick at September 15, 2005 2:38 PM

TOW missiles would be such a great accessory even on non-Hummers to take care of the annoying slow driver in front of you on the highway -- either that, or figure out a way to shoot a couple of cruise missiles into the rear of the vehicle before igniting, and sending the offending driver and car/truck/SUV up above the highway and off towards the horizon at several hundred miles per hour.

Posted by: John at September 15, 2005 2:50 PM

pcharles,

Do you have an 11-Hotel background or are you just an efficient Googler?

JP

Posted by: jefferson park at September 15, 2005 2:55 PM

Jefferson Park: the latter. One of the great regrets of my life, no military experience.

Posted by: pcharles is pchuck at September 15, 2005 4:28 PM

I think a TOW missile is just too limited a weapon. I would want and would only buy an H-1 or H-2 if it were equipped with a 50 caliber machine gun. That will suffice for most unarmored vehicles and be much more useful for dealing with pedestrians.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2005 6:16 PM

Mr. Schwartz:
Like the nitwits in Hanover, NH who basically throw themselves into traffic safe in the knowledge that they are immune to cars. Get some!

pchuck:
I know how you feel, and I feel the same way sometimes. But I was such a nitwit at 18 that there's no way I could have survived the military. I look at the kids who are in the military today and think, "Wow, these kids have got their act together!"

Posted by: Governor Breck at September 15, 2005 7:36 PM

Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided? Except for the kaboom at the end it's just a spitball with a college education.

Posted by: jgm at September 15, 2005 8:24 PM

Gov: Must be endemic to college towns. In Northampton, the cross walks downtown have little signs in the middle that say "State Law: Vehicles must yield to pedestrians in crosswalk." That is understood by both pedestrians and most drivers to mean that if a pedestrian approaches the curb from the sidewalk -- regardless of whether there is a crosswalk anywhere close -- drivers on both sides of the divided Main Street must immediately stand on their breaks and then wait until the pedestrian has completed his or her crossing.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 15, 2005 10:29 PM

Helluva spitball. Helluva kaboom.

Posted by: jefferson park at September 15, 2005 11:05 PM

Gov: I will drive you can man the 50.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 15, 2005 11:12 PM
« BIPARTISANSHIP MEANS YOU AGREEING WITH ME | Main | CAREER CHICKEN LITTLES »