September 30, 2005

RICH FOLK DON'T GET THEIR HANDS DIRTY:

The great jobs switch: The fall in manufacturing employment in developed economies is a sign of economic progress, not decline (The Economist, Sep 29th 2005)

THAT employment in manufacturing, once the engine of growth, is in a long, slow decline in the rich world is a familiar notion. That it is on its way to being virtually wiped out is not. Yet calculations by The Economist suggest that manufacturing now accounts for less than 10% of total jobs in America. Other rich countries are moving in that direction, too, with Britain close behind America, followed by France and Japan, with Germany and Italy lagging behind (see article).

Shrinking employment in any sector sounds like bad news. It isn't. Manufacturing jobs disappear because economies are healthy, not sick.

The decline of manufacturing in rich countries is a more complex story than the piles of Chinese-made goods in shops suggest. Manufacturing output continues to expand in most developed countries—in America, by almost 4% a year on average since 1991. Despite the rise in Chinese exports, America is still the world's biggest manufacturer, producing about twice as much, measured by value, as China.

The continued growth in manufacturing output shows that the fall in jobs has not been caused by mass substitution of Chinese goods for locally made ones. It has happened because rich-world companies have replaced workers with new technology to boost productivity and shifted production from labour-intensive products such as textiles to higher-tech, higher value-added, sectors such as pharmaceuticals. Within firms, low-skilled jobs have moved offshore. Higher-value R&D, design and marketing have stayed at home.

All that is good. Faster productivity growth means higher average incomes. Low rates of unemployment in the countries which have shifted furthest away from manufacturing suggest that most laid-off workers have found new jobs. And consumers have benefited from cheap Chinese imports.


No one who's nostalgic for hard labor actually does any.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 30, 2005 3:05 PM
Comments

I'm probably the odd man out here. Hardly a day goes by when I don't get dirty, or sweat heavily doing hard work. I don't mind at all, however, I wish I was a younger man.

Posted by: AllenS [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 30, 2005 4:46 PM

We are becomming a nation of Wal-mart greeters and burger flippers.

Oh hurray.

Posted by: Your Uncle Darnell at September 30, 2005 11:28 PM

YUD:

Know any?

Posted by: oj at September 30, 2005 11:36 PM

We are becoming a nation of Wal-mart greeters and burger flippers and privately-owned spaceship designers and people that make huge commercial airliners out of sand and glue.

"Hurray" is correct, although a bit understated.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 1, 2005 4:58 PM

Our particular dilemma is the result of the postwar explosion in manufacturing employment in the US, and the subsequent elevation of the unskilled factory worker into the middle class. That event has set an unreasonably high level of expectation for living standards that can be accomplished by unskilled, manual labor.

Such progress is beneficial for those who can keep up with the higher requirements for skilled and productive workers. In real terms it also benefits those who can't keep up, although poverty today is more of a social and psychological affliction, and less so a material one. A burger flipper today is materially better off than an unskilled factory laborer of the 1950s, though he may feel less well off in comparison to his peers.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at October 3, 2005 11:46 AM

Robert:

Unreasonably high? It's reality.

Posted by: oj at October 3, 2005 1:42 PM
« WHO'S OFF CENTER?: | Main | PROGRESSIVE EUROPE (via b): »