September 28, 2005

OUR GANG:

'Gang of 14' backing Roberts (Charles Hurt, September 28, 2005, THE WASHINGTON TIMES)

The "Gang of 14" senators who brokered the end to judicial filibusters has so far stuck together in unanimously supporting the nomination of federal Judge John G. Roberts Jr. to be the next Supreme Court chief justice.

That stamp of approval, Republican leaders say, paves the way for a smoother confirmation of the next Supreme Court nominee.

"The process has been handled very well," Majority Whip Mitch McConnell told reporters yesterday. "The outcome will be largely bipartisan. I think that's very good for the Senate, because in many ways the Senate itself was on trial here."

Specifically, Republican leaders say, the comfortable approval of Judge Roberts means the next nominee should be confirmed without answering specific questions on personal opinions about abortion and other hot-button political issues.

One is obligated to note that even for the Stupid Party it's hard to believe how wrong the critics of the Gang turned out to be--the deal has done nothing but help the President and his nominees.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 28, 2005 9:35 AM
Comments

Oh, so close. The deal has done nothing -- except cost some Republican nominees their confirmation for no payoff whatsoever. Certainly, Roberts would have been confirmed deal or no deal.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 28, 2005 12:18 PM

Brown and Owen wouldn't be potential nominees.

Posted by: oj at September 28, 2005 12:55 PM

OJ:

I wonder if your thinking is running along the same lines as mine: We nominate Brown, let the Dems hijack the process for a while, and then use the agreement's loopholes to dump the filibuster and get her confirmed. Karl Rove must be drooling over the prospect of seeing the Democrats obstruct Senate business to keep a black female off the Supreme Court.

Agreed, this deal was brilliant. I can't believe the Democrats have allowed themselves to be put into this position.

Posted by: Matt Murphy at September 28, 2005 2:56 PM

Brown and Owen wouldn't be on the appeals bench without the deal. Unless David gets every last wingnut judge-wannabe past the Senate, he thinks the deal is worthless.

When 60 right-wing Repubs sit in the Senate, David's dream will come true. For now we live in the real world.

Posted by: Casey Abell at September 28, 2005 3:36 PM

I liken Bush to Jackie Robinson. Both withstood the slings and arrows for a cause they believed in and both are expert players of their respective game.

Robinson is a hero of mine. I remember going to Ebbets field as a kid and saw how an ordinary looking man could stand in a big field surrounded by tens of thousands of people who hated him passionately and not only play the game, but play it better than anyone else.

Jackie Robinson deserves the thanks of a grateful nation as does our president.

Posted by: erp at September 28, 2005 3:39 PM

Casey:

Speak for yourself. The blogosphere lives in the blogosphere and reality rarely intrudes.

Posted by: oj at September 28, 2005 3:53 PM

So, Casey's defense of the deal is that is does, in fact, tie the president's hands by preventing his wingnut nominees from getting confirmed. Matt's defense is that this is a good deal because it is so bad that when it inevitably explodes it will get us what we should have gotten six months ago. OJ's is that Republican moderates, including OJ's 2008 presidential candidate, were always going to knife the president in the back so that this was the best we could have done and, in the end, it hasn't done any real harm. ERP's defense is that Bush is the first black president.

Yeah, that's quite the win you guys got yourself there.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 29, 2005 12:23 PM

The conservatives want to keep the tradition of filibusters.

Posted by: oj at September 29, 2005 12:51 PM

There's a truth. The main concern of the Gang of 14 was to preserve the prerogatives of the Senate, even if they have to stab the president and the party in the back to do so.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 29, 2005 4:10 PM

Yes, conservatism is about permanent institutions and traditions, not personalities and immediate gratification.

Posted by: oj at September 29, 2005 4:56 PM
« THERE'S HIS FIRST CAMPAIGN AD FOR SC: | Main | JUST ANOTHER SPECIAL INTEREST: »