September 23, 2005
NO, LOOK AT THE OTHER BIG PICTURE:
Limiting Government's Role: Bush favors one-time fixes over boosting existing programs to help Katrina victims. (Peter G. Gosselin and Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, September 23, 2005, LA Times)
Two days after Hurricane Katrina slammed into the Gulf Coast, the Department of Housing and Urban Development announced plans to issue emergency vouchers aimed at helping poor storm victims find new housing quickly by covering as much as $10,000 of their rent.But the department suddenly backed away from the idea after White House aides met with senior HUD officials. Although emergency vouchers had been successfully used after the 1994 Northridge earthquake, the administration focused instead on a plan for government-built trailer parks, an approach that even many Republicans say would concentrate poverty in the very fashion the government has long sought to avoid. [...]
As President Bush tackles the monumental task of easing the social problems wrought by Katrina, he is proving deeply reluctant to use some of the big-government tools at his disposal, apparently out of fear of permanently enlarging programs that he opposes or has sought to cut.
Instead of depending on long-running programs for such services as housing and healthcare, the president has generally tried to create new, one-shot efforts that the administration apparently hopes will more easily disappear after the crisis passes. That has meant relying on the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which has run virtually all of the recovery effort. [...]
At least in the case of housing, critics say that the president's unwillingness to rely on existing programs could raise costs. Instead of offering $10,000 vouchers, FEMA is paying an average of $16,000 for each trailer in the new parks it is contemplating. Even many Republicans wonder why the government would want to build trailer parks when many evacuees are now living in communities with plenty of vacant, privately owned apartments.
Any time the GOP can voucherize any government service it ought to. Posted by Orrin Judd at September 23, 2005 11:44 AM
Amazing this posting hasn't attracted comments as it highlights a very serious problem, namely, the WH itself is frustrating attempts to voucherize. To listen to the post-Katrina "how recovery aid will be shaped" discussion, one got the impression a flood of voucher programs would be unleashed. What a terrible lost opportunity if the story depicts a trend.
Posted by: Luciferous at September 23, 2005 6:01 PMLuciferous:
It just sounds like a case of competing priorities. Certainly vouchers should trump the fretting about permanence.
Posted by: oj at September 23, 2005 6:06 PM