September 9, 2005
KEEPING HIS EYE ON THE BALL:
Bush Suspends Pay Act In Areas Hit by Storm (Thomas B. Edsall, September 9, 2005, Washington Post)
President Bush yesterday suspended application of the federal law governing workers' pay on federal contracts in the Hurricane Katrina-damaged areas of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The action infuriated labor leaders and their Democratic supporters in Congress, who said it will lower wages and make it harder for union contractors to win bids.The Davis-Bacon Act, passed in 1931 during the Great Depression, sets a minimum pay scale for workers on federal contracts by requiring contractors to pay the prevailing or average pay in the region. Suspension of the act will allow contractors to pay lower wages. Many Republicans have opposed Davis-Bacon, charging that it amounts to a taxpayer subsidy to unions.
In a letter to Congress, Bush said he has the power to suspend the law because of the national emergency caused by the hurricane: "I have found that the conditions caused by Hurricane Katrina constitute a 'national emergency.' "
Bush wrote that his decision is justified because Davis-Bacon increases construction costs, and suspension "will result in greater assistance to these devastated communities and will permit the employment of thousands of additional individuals."
AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney denounced the Bush announcement as "outrageous."
Here's why George Bush, even if you concede the Democrats' argument that he butchered the response to the Hurricane, is the greatest conservative president in our history. Recall that he only accepted the Department of Homeland Security because of political necessity and the clandestine opportunity it afforded to get rid of cumbersome civil service rules. Now he turns the "resulting" disaster into yet another sub rosa attack on organized labor. These guys are scary good. Posted by Orrin Judd at September 9, 2005 11:05 AM
Let's see the President's opponents and the media (sorry for the redundancy) argue that an impediment to swift aid should be kept in place.
Posted by: Melissa at September 9, 2005 12:05 PMI believe his father did the same thing in response to a disaster. I don't think Clinton ever did.
Unfortunately it is only temporary.
Posted by: AWW at September 9, 2005 12:06 PMMelissa - it is clear 1 week on, even with mounting evidence of local and state bungling, the media and Dems will continue to put all the blame on Bush. Hopefully the public will see right through it.
Posted by: AWW at September 9, 2005 12:08 PMBut wait a minnute! What about Gannon-gate?? What about Richard Clarke's crushing testimony?? What about Valerie Plame?? What about all those explosives at Al-Quaqaa?? What about the Air National Guard??
I been harping on it, now we start to see it. The DeMSM's have utterly lost the cardinal ability to "pick your battle's wisely". They have assumed that an attack that succeeds is good, one that fails is nuetral. It is NOT nuetral, it costs them ammo in political capital and credibility of seriousness, and now, when they really COULD sink their teeth in, fairly or not, they can't, because they have dulled their incisors on stupid, penny-ante, nickel and dime foolishness.
Katrina response is not foolish, but no one is listening any more.
You guys think the Dem's have the MSM? Man, where do you guys all live, in a special home or something?
Posted by: at September 9, 2005 1:17 PMIt takes money to manipulate media; money that the Dem's don't have. Not to mention the conflict of interest that arise when most television is sponsored by some of the worlds largest companies, and most major media companies are operated by some of the wealthiest companies/businessmen in the world.
Editor's note: use at least a pseudonym or get deleted. don't post material from other sites as your own or get deleted. Links suffice.
Posted by: at September 9, 2005 1:21 PMHere's another fine example of Mr. Bush not knowing which end is up. He will, no doubt, rescind this decision when it is pointed out to him that no one at Halliburton will be willing to work for less than "the prevailing or average pay in the region".
Posted by: SeekerOfTruth at September 9, 2005 1:23 PMMellisa,
The Bush administration seems determined to keep an impediment to swift aid in place. Michael Brown still has his job.
AWW,
I hate to tell you this (not) but the Dems are part of the public, and we are seeing through it. People who can't see the truth of the matter should just ride their Arabian Horses off into the sunset (supplied by the view through their rose collered glasses.)
Looks like somebody has an endless loop of F9/11 playing in his head. There are perfectly good pharmaceuticals for OC disorder. Thank God for the scroll feature.
Posted by: Melissa at September 9, 2005 1:42 PMGotta love the attack of the cut n' paste bandit. Anonymous, of course.
JAG --
You're approximately one half hour behind the news. Brown is out.
Seeker-
Halliburton has employs 3000 people in La. They'll get what they got before. Both Halliburton and KBR have ongoing contracts with DOD and Interior, they'll get waht they contracted for. Truth is good, seek it fully.
Posted by: Randy
at September 9, 2005 2:05 PM
JAG:
Sure, Brown should have gone last summer after he presided over the horrible Federal response to all those hurricanes in Florida. I mean, you remember all the stories about the thousands dying, the aid that never got there or got there too late, the endless Congressional hearings on how FEMA went in the toilet after Clinton, Bush golfing while people were losing everything they had.
And it's not like he ever had to be confirmed. Bush just appointed him with no scrutiny at all. Right?
Posted by: Rick T. at September 9, 2005 3:18 PMLack of Bush Eloquence Imperils Hurricane Victims
by Scott Ott 9/01/05 WWW.Scrappleface.com
(2005-09-01) --
Fears increased today among hundreds of thousands of refugees from the hurricane-ravaged gulf coast as they faced a Labor Day weekend with little hope of an eloquent speech from President George Bush.
As today's New York Times editorial indicated, the president "gave one of the worst speeches of his life yesterday, especially given the level of national distress and the need for words of consolation and wisdom".
Instead, the president devoted his first major post-Katrina address to laying out what the federal government is actually doing to help with disaster recovery.[...]
Posted by: Genecis at September 9, 2005 5:05 PMIf you'd like to hear some honest-to-goodness screeching, check out Kevin Drum at the Washington Monthly.
I think the Chinese use that sort of bile in old medicinal remedies.
Posted by: Steve White at September 9, 2005 6:26 PMIn response to Rick T, Kevin Drum and the Washington Monthly citizens would have you know that it was all politics (of course) that led 'Brownie' and FEMA to throw money at the Florida hurricane victims. It was in no way shape or form good policy to get in quick, distribute food, water, ice, and aid checks, it was all scheming to get GWB re-elected. Why, the graft and corruption from these hurricanes wrought terrible harm to the Republic, though Florida seems to have done okay.
I wonder what their response would be if one was to ask them whether it's okay to throw money at the Katrina victms just as was done in Florida.
Posted by: Steve White at September 9, 2005 6:30 PM"I believe his father did the same thing in response to a disaster. I don't think Clinton ever did."
I think I read somewhere that Clinton used non-union labor to construct his Presidential library/massage parlor.
