September 23, 2005
JUST ANOTHER MAJOR REWRITE:
Rewrite of Endangered Species Law Approved: House to Vote Soon; Senate Could in 2006 (Juliet Eilperin, September 23, 2005, Washington Post)
Setting the stage for the most sweeping restructuring of endangered species protections in three decades, the House Resources Committee yesterday approved legislation that would strengthen the hand of private property owners and make it harder for federal officials to set aside large swaths of habitat for imperiled plants and animals.Committee Chairman Richard W. Pombo (R-Calif.), who has sought to revamp the Endangered Species Act for more than a decade, said the bill would make the landmark 32-year-old law more effective.
"The whole underlying premise of what we're trying to do is recover species," Pombo said, adding that his measure would ensure "individual property owners are not forced to shoulder the financial burden of conserving endangered species for all Americans."
GOP leaders are eager to move the bill and it is expected to pass by a comfortable margin next week. The question remains whether Senate Republicans, who have begun hearings on the issue but have yet to introduce legislation, can pass a bill that would allow the two chambers to reach a compromise next year.
Many Democrats, as well as some Republicans and an array of environmental groups, have voiced concern about Pombo's measure and suggested it would not pass as it now stands.
What areas of legislative concern won't the President and Congress have sweepingly restructured by 2009? Posted by Orrin Judd at September 23, 2005 8:46 AM
What areas of legislative concern won't the President and Congress have sweepingly restructured by 2009?
1) Social Security
2) McCain-Feingold (i.e. re-restructured)
3) Income tax simplification
Everyone gets excited about Kelo or unfunded mandates, but getting rid of this sort of regulatory taking, in which, as the Congressmen says, the entire cost of national policy is imposed on random citizens, is where the real action is.
Posted by: David Cohen at September 23, 2005 11:07 AMMcCain-Feingold is a Bush era reform. Tax policy has been drastically rewritten. Social security remains in doubt.
Posted by: oj at September 23, 2005 11:35 AMYes, McCain-Feingold *is* a Bush era reform (a bug, not a feature), hence my use of 're-restructured'; i.e. it goes away, I fervently hope.
If the estate tax is dismantled under Bush 43, I will consider that achievement enough to warrant the term 'drastic'; absent that I cannot.
Posted by: Bruce Cleaver at September 23, 2005 2:05 PMIsn't there a built in time limit for CFR?
Posted by: erp at September 23, 2005 3:14 PM