August 17, 2005
ONE LEAKS, THE OTHER BAILS:
Democrats Feel Heat From Left On Roberts (Charles Babington and Dan Balz, August 17, 2005, Washington Post)
Major liberal groups accused Democratic senators yesterday of showing too little stomach for opposing John G. Roberts Jr.'s Supreme Court nomination, saying newly released documents indicate he is much more conservative than many people first thought.The response was quick and pointed, as two key senators unleashed their sharpest criticisms yet of Roberts and sought to assure activists that the battle is far from over.
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the Judiciary Committee's ranking Democrat, said in a statement: "Those papers that we have received paint a picture of John Roberts as an eager and aggressive advocate of policies that are deeply tinged with the ideology of the far right wing of his party then, and now. In influential White House and Department of Justice positions, John Roberts expressed views that were among the most radical being offered by a cadre intent on reversing decades of policies on civil rights, voting rights, women's rights, privacy, and access to justice." [...]
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), the committee's senior member, also took his criticisms of Roberts to new heights yesterday in a letter to colleagues.
So much for the Democratic strategy of not being defined by their far Left--Ted Kennedy inside the Beltway and Ms Sheehan outside.
MORE:
Sheehan Feeling the Glare of the Spotlight: Some Are Focusing Anger on Protester (Michael A. Fletcher, August 17, 2005, Washington Post)
Cindy Sheehan rode into town 10 days ago, a forlorn mother with a question for her president: Why did my son die in Iraq?Posted by Orrin Judd at August 17, 2005 7:05 AMBut now the same wave of publicity and political anger that she rode to become a nationally known symbol of the antiwar movement threatens to crash down on Sheehan herself.
Good headline, by the way.
Posted by: Governor Breck at August 17, 2005 9:13 AMI doubt that a filibuster will occur, but Snowe, Collins, Specter etc might switch sides, therefore it's possible Republicans will need Democratic votes. I think they can get them.
Posted by: h-man at August 17, 2005 10:55 AMNo, they mightn't.
Posted by: oj at August 17, 2005 11:02 AMI guess that Sheehan thought that being the mother of a dead soldier gave her the moral status that would make her immune from criticism. Doesn't work that way. People are tired of hearing outraged self-righteousness from those who can't deal with their persona tragedy with dignity, or feel that they are owed by society for their loss.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at August 17, 2005 11:33 AMCindy Sheehan has entered a zone all her own, beyond even the Kucinich zone. Michael Moore at least is getting rich; Cindy is just getting used. But that might be all she has left. I hope not.
Posted by: jim hamlen at August 17, 2005 11:58 AMMeanwhile, back in New York Times Lalaland...
Posted by: Matt Murphy at August 18, 2005 2:00 AM