August 29, 2005
LIBERATION AND OCCUPATION AREN'T COMPATIBLE:
The Chalabi Comeback: Iraq's "indispensable" man returns to center stage. (ROBERT L. POLLOCK, August 29, 2005, Opinion Journal)
[Ahmed Chalabi] survived a concerted White House campaign last year to undermine him, brokering the Shiite-led electoral list that won the January election and becoming deputy prime minister; because he had become a major player in the constitution-writing process that culminated this past weekend; and because he is rapidly becoming a key figure for U.S. military commanders on the ground here as they contemplate the feasibility of troop drawdowns."Very personally courageous," "not afraid to make decisions," and a "hugely important figure in Iraq" are among the phrases I heard U.S. officers apply to him during two weeks I spent in the country earlier this month. Another sums up the stakes thus: "Chalabi is there to talk about protecting strategic infrastructure so they can sell oil so they can fund their own security-force development."
He's referring to the fact that Mr. Chalabi has assumed special responsibility for oil and infrastructure security--a role in which he is widely recognized to be making major improvements on the abysmal performance of L. Paul Bremer's Coalition Provisional Authority and Ayad Allawi's interim government. I watch him in action firsthand shortly after my arrival, chairing a meeting of the Energy Committee he helped create. He suggests that the electrical grid be mapped with GPS, since after a recent attack it took three days to locate the damage. The issue is quickly resolved, as a water ministry official informs the room that such data already exists and that the problem is merely information-sharing. Then Mr. Chalabi offers a gentle reprimand to the Iraqi Army's deputy chief of staff for continued reliance on a local infrastructure protection battalion that has repeatedly failed. What's more important, he asks, keeping some tribal sheikh happy or keeping the lights on in Baghdad?
It doesn't sound like much, but in a society where the modus vivendi for decades has been to tell people exactly what they want to hear, real managerial skills are a rare trait. "Chalabi has emerged as a central figure in the effort to improve infrastructure security," says Gen. David Petraeus, the overseer of Iraqi Security Force training and one of the few officials willing to risk offending the foreign policy mandarins in Washington by going on record about the matter. In particular, Mr. Chalabi is credited with obtaining additional Iraqi funding and focus on the effort, resulting in what one U.S. observer calls "the highest crude oil exports in anyone's memory." Northern exports through the Kirkuk pipeline have resumed, albeit quietly--lest it become an even more tempting target for sabotage.
When we look back at the liberation of Iraq twenty years hence, the biggest error of the Administration will be seen to be the failure to work with Ayatollah Sistani ahead of time and lay the groundwork for the immediate assumption of power by a transitional Shi'ite regime led by Mr. Chalabi in 2003, instead of an American occupation. Posted by Orrin Judd at August 29, 2005 3:29 PM
"[Ahmed Chalabi] survived a concerted White House campaign last year to undermine him..."
Wasn't it a State Dep't & CIA campaign? Not exactly the same thing as the White House...
Didn't he used to work for the CIA by providing false intelligence for money and to get people out of Iraq? Didn't he get caught lying on "60 Minutes." Isn't he about as corrupt as puppet leaders come?
I think it's been like 3 days since I read an article you posted that was such an obvious piece of Bush propaganda.
It was the Bush team that smeared him. Of course he lied to us and the media--he had to get us to depose Saddam. Worked.
Posted by: oj at August 29, 2005 4:50 PMHow is this in any way Bush propaganda? The administration disowned him and labeled him as an Iranian spy. Now, they might have done that to rehabilitate him with the Iraqis, but that doesn't make this article Bush propaganda.
Posted by: David Cohen at August 29, 2005 4:51 PMChalabi skimmed funds from the coalition and gave bogus WMD intel.
The only thing Chalabi cares about is Chalabi.
Posted by: Gideon at August 29, 2005 7:04 PMNo, he also cared about liberating Iraq--he did it too. Ben Franklin lied like hell to get the French to help us--made him a liar and a great patriot.
Posted by: oj at August 29, 2005 7:41 PMonly idiots tell the truth on 60 Minutes..
Posted by: JonofAtlanta at August 29, 2005 8:16 PMOnly idiots appear on 60 Minutes.
Posted by: joe shropshire at August 29, 2005 9:18 PMOnly convicted bank defrauders should be allowed to run Iraq.
Posted by: Rick Perlstein at August 30, 2005 2:12 AMEven the Jordanians recognize that conviction was a steaming pile:
http://www.brothersjudd.com/blog/archives/2005/05/last_laugh_2.html
Posted by: oj at August 30, 2005 7:46 AMI generally agree with OJ on this. I think looking back it would have been far better to immediately install a temporary Iraq government. Chalabi would have been the logical choice to head such a government.
As for the Jordon conviction, I'm glad to see liberals like Rick P. have such a nice opinion of Jordanian justice. Reminds me of the left's sudden good opinion of covert CIA agents.
Posted by: Bob at August 30, 2005 10:30 AMAlso you can't be having those nasty convicted bank frauds replacing decent ordinary honest mass murderers as heads of state -- think of what it would do to the international system. Come back here with those goalposts, Rick.
Posted by: joe shropshire at August 30, 2005 2:12 PM