July 3, 2005
THE LAST DEMOCRAT:
Richie Daley's party (Robert Novak, July 3, 2005, Townhall)
Last week's long-range confrontation between Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley and Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin was much more than a personal tiff involving two formidable Illinois Democrats who obviously are not fond of each other. It contrasted Daley's majority Democratic Party of bygone years with Durbin's minority Democratic Party of today.
When Daley in his June 21 press conference referred to Durbin's rancorous comments about the U.S. military as a "disgrace," he was only repeating in public what many old-line Democratic loyalists told me not for quotation. But Durbin's Washington party colleagues defended his comparison of the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo with the bloodiest genocidal regimes in history. Durbin was forced into a grudging half-apology later on June 21 only because Daley spoke out.Daley sees Durbin as typical of today's negative, Washington-oriented Democratic Party. [...]
Daley spoke out June 21 in no small part because his 29-year-old son, Pvt. Patrick Daley of the U.S. Army airborne infantry, was visiting at home. Although Durbin now says he did not mean to criticize the Army by comparing interrogation at Guantanamo with mass murder by Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot, that was how Patrick and his father interpreted it. The mayor's son, who reported for basic training last Dec. 29, resented what the senator said. [...]
Daley seldom speaks out publicly about his party. He did in April 1995 when I visited his office. He told me then that Democrats had become the party of "Washington," "the bureaucrats" and "the special interests," and now constituted the "pro-tax party."
The reality is that Mr. Daley is far closer to George W. Bush in stylistic and political terms than to any national Democrat. Posted by Orrin Judd at July 3, 2005 12:00 AM
They should have listened to Zell.
Posted by: Ed Driscoll at July 3, 2005 6:14 AMLinguistically as well, which is why Bush's adventures in syntax bothers me not a whit. No one thinks that Daley, whatever his other failings, is not a bright individual.
Posted by: Rick T. at July 3, 2005 10:53 AMHe maybe the Democrats only hope.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at July 3, 2005 5:14 PMOJ,
Them's fightin words for those of us who are trying to change IL from blue to red.
I'll buy that Daley is an astute politician who rues the day the McGovernites took over his Dad's party.
That doesn't white wash the incredible corruption his regime has foisted upon this poor state. IL Republicans have modeled themselves after Daley instead of Reagan, and are paying the price electorally.
Why support a tiny sow (IL establishment Republicans) when you can get behind the big honking boar.
I'm right in the middle of Rules for Radicals by Alinski, and Daley is the enforcer for all this dangerous radical stood for. Daley is the power behind the New New Left here, and all the acumen in the world doesn't change the fact the he's the enemy.
Posted by: BB at July 6, 2005 12:18 AMCorruption goes with city government. It's things like his school program that divide him off from the rest of the party.
Posted by: oj at July 6, 2005 7:59 AM