June 5, 2005
SLOWER BUT SAFER:
Report Presses Easy Ways to Fix Airline Security (ERIC LIPTON, 6/05/05, NY Times)
Significant gaps in security at the nation's airports could be curtailed even at a time of rising passenger traffic by quickly making a wide range of relatively modest changes in screening people and bags, a confidential report by the Department of Homeland Security has concluded.Fixing serious weaknesses in the nation's aviation security system is critical as passenger traffic rises beyond levels seen before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the report observed. This summer, passengers are expected to take about 200 million trips globally on the nation's airlines, up about 4 percent from last year.
The proposed fine-tuning of airport security includes expanding the use of devices that can detect trace amounts of explosives and stationing more armed guards in secure areas.
"There is increasing pressure to increase the flow of passengers and their property through security checkpoints," the report said. "Unfortunately, our analysis has shown there are significant security gaps at checkpoints as they currently exist."
How about ways to improve security but cause even greater delays, so you make flying even less desirable an option? Posted by Orrin Judd at June 5, 2005 8:41 AM
Their most effective recommendations are things we learned literally on our first day in business school 25 years ago, about how to speed up service in a restaurant.
Still news to the government, I guess.
Posted by: ZF at June 5, 2005 9:53 AMHow about this as a way to improve airline security: Announce that if any US plane is highjacked, the home town and all known (non-US) addresses he lived at anytime in the last 10 years will be obliterated in 48 hours.
Posted by: ray at June 5, 2005 2:54 PMAll airliners have armored doors to the flight deck.
Virtually all the security we have now is a classic case of closing the barn door after the horses have left.
OJ:
Just because you view flying with the same stoic intestinal fortitude for which pre-teen girls are so rightly famous doesn't mean the rest of us have to.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at June 5, 2005 6:58 PM