June 22, 2005
GENTLEMEN, START YOUR ENGINES?:
White House interviews candidates for Rehnquist post, official says (JAN CRAWFORD GREENBURG, 6/21/05, Chicago Tribune)
Stepping up preparations for the possible retirement of Chief Justice William Rehnquist - perhaps as early as next week - the White House has narrowed its list to a handful of federal appeals court judges and has conducted interviews with leading contenders, a senior administration official said Tuesday.Senior White House officials and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have interviewed top candidates and briefed President Bush, but the president has not made a decision, said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
White House officials also consider Gonzales to be a possible nominee, according to the official and other sources close to the administration. But the focus has been on the other judges, leaving Gonzales in a separate category because of the president's longstanding familiarity with him, the official said.
Gonzales, 49, would meet fierce opposition from the conservative groups that see him as too moderate to replace the conservative Rehnquist. As a Texas Supreme Court justice, Gonzales voted to strike down some state abortion regulations, and as White House counsel, he opposed taking a hard line against affirmative action.
But Bush has long said he would like to name the first Hispanic to the Supreme Court and likes the idea of the "Gonzales Court," sources close to the White House said. The political calculation for Bush is whether he risks offending his conservative base to make Gonzales chief justice or holds off, gambling that a liberal or more moderate justice - such as John Paul Stevens or Sandra Day O'Connor - would also retire during his presidency.
Supposedly the buzz is that he retires Monday and they've got a nominee ready for Tuesday. Posted by Orrin Judd at June 22, 2005 12:12 AM
I still say the next vacancy is years away and only occurs after there's a court order to remove the tubes. As a group, they're gonna make the argument for changing life-time tenure for judges easy.
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at June 22, 2005 12:54 PMRaoul, I suspect that a few of the more liberal justices are trying to hang on until after '08, when they hope a Democrat can appoint their replacements.
Posted by: PapayaSF at June 22, 2005 1:38 PMCry Havoc and let loose the dogs of war.
Posted by: jd watson at June 22, 2005 4:17 PM"Supposedly the buzz is..."
Now that's the type of insight I come to brothersjudd for--a rumor about a rumor. Great stuff...
the prospect of the gop senate being rolled again, is just too sad to contemplate. hopefully they won't announce their surrender before the democrats ask for it.
Posted by: cjm at June 22, 2005 5:41 PMi read on another site that it is o'connor who is expected to step down.
Posted by: cjm at June 22, 2005 7:05 PM