June 3, 2005

FIVE C'S:

European civilisation has sown the seeds of its own decline and fall (Gerard Baker, 6/03/05, Times of London)

These twin threats — the economic challenge of fiercely competitive globalisation and a political challenge to the culturally deracinated, splintering societies — are driving Europe into debilitating turmoil.

Interestingly, these threats converge again today in modern Turkey, an economically dynamic nation of 70 million Muslims, whose hopes of ending centuries of geographical ambivalence and joining the European club were dealt a final shattering blow this week. More important, though, it was these two forces, which lay directly behind respectively the French and Dutch “no” votes, that have intensified the mood of crisis.

In their different ways, the two referendums were surely symbolic events, marking the culmination of a decade or more of European disintegration and decline.

It is probably no accident that this process began just as Europe reached the pinnacle of its achievements. Forty-five years after the Second World War, continental Western Europe could plausibly claim to have created a kind of postmodern nirvana — a half-continent-wide zone of unparalleled prosperity, cushioned by an apparently permanent peace among some of the most historically murderous peoples on Earth.

Under its expensive welfare programmes, paid for by a high level of productivity in traditional manufacturing industries, Europeans enjoyed a pampered life. With the Soviet threat gone, this accelerating prosperity further encouraged them to renounce the idea of war and military coercion, and they settled down to enjoy an assured future ascendancy.

By the beginning of the 1990s, with America in apparent decline, it seemed a reasonable bet that this extraordinary model of economic and political success would become an example to the world. But external and internal forces were already undermining this paradise.

In economics, the forces of globalisation unleashed by an emergent Asia and an information technology revolution were reviving the American eco-nomy and giving birth to new, dynamic competitors. This speed-of-light competitive world of the microchip and flexible capital markets would require nimbleness, and an end to the protections that seemed to have helped Europe to become the success story of the 1980s. The Anglo-Saxon economies, in response to their own economic crises of the 1970s, had prepared themselves for this new world with painful but necessary reforms.

But Europe looked inward, not outward. Instead of focusing on what was needed – American and British-style labour reforms, tax cuts and deregulation — Europe embarked on a quix- otic exercise. It sought to weld a dozen or more disparate countries into an unbreakable economic union, all settled snug and warm under the fraying comfort blanket of expensive welfare systems.

In the political field too, even at its zenith, Europe had been surrendering the tools that had given it peace and harmony. It owed its years of peace not to some solemn intra-European comity but to the hard steel of US firepower, primed to defend Europe from the Soviet Union. But by the early 1990s, having shed its bloody past, Europe had lost the moral will as well as the capacity to face down new threats at home and abroad to the freedoms it cherished. [...]

At home, the same moral relativism, bred by years of pampered prosperity, was creating its own destructive forces. Again, egged on by intellectual elites, Europeans were encouraged to despise the civilisation that had nurtured them. The nation state was pronounced a hateful anachronism that had to be replaced by a pan-European superstate. The West’s defining values of enlightened tolerance and freedom were not superior to anyone else’s. Crime was the fault of its own unfair societies.

Immigrants who came to its countries were not to be forced to live by its own rules but by theirs, even if that meant “honour” killings and jihad. The effort to produce tolerant, multicultural societies resulted in the paradox of radical liberal democracies such as the Netherlands enthusiastically nurturing forces at home that sought to destroy the freedoms in which they were being incubated.


So, the only things Europe lacks are the church, culture, children, competitiveness, and courage?

Posted by Orrin Judd at June 3, 2005 5:32 PM
Comments

also conscience, cohesiveness, and coherence

Posted by: cjm at June 3, 2005 5:38 PM

Don't forget chutzpah! Wait a minute...they have that in spades...nevermind.

Posted by: Bartman at June 3, 2005 5:47 PM

And crape.

Posted by: Luciferous at June 3, 2005 6:16 PM

Baseball?

Posted by: Jim in Chicago at June 3, 2005 7:30 PM

Turkey is economically dynamic?

Orrin used to ask us to look around the house and count all the imports from Niger.

Same for Turkey. I'll bet nobody here has anything except maybe hazelnuts and a pair of flimsy shoes.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at June 3, 2005 8:30 PM

Check your clothing labels--you'll find a bunch.

Posted by: oj at June 3, 2005 8:54 PM

they didn't say turkey was passing japan as the #2 economy (or is that the prc now), just that it had potential.
fyi: i am really down on taiwan now; let the reds have it.

Posted by: cjm at June 3, 2005 9:21 PM

My favorite passage: "By the beginning of the 1990s, with America in apparent decline..."

Words to these people are just not something that has any contact with reality whatsoever.

Posted by: Tom at June 3, 2005 10:24 PM

What're we betting? I've got about a dozen items plus from Turkey. It helps that I have an aunt who lives and works there.

Posted by: Rick at June 4, 2005 12:21 AM

I have more things here at home from Cambodia, Hondorus and China than I do from Turkey.

Posted by: Dave W at June 4, 2005 10:21 AM

I have more clothing with labels from the economic powerhouse Paraguay than from Turkey. (1 v. 0).

If that's the standard, Bangladesh is the place to place your bets.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at June 4, 2005 5:46 PM

Oops, I just noticed that I misspelled Honduras in my above post. Please forgive me if I've offended anyone by my unintentional error.

Posted by: Dave W. at June 4, 2005 6:03 PM

Harry:

Yes, Bangladesh too is a functional Muslim democracy with a growing economy and even some Anglospheric ties. The monsoons make it a dicey proposition though.

Posted by: oj at June 4, 2005 7:02 PM

national review has a person on the ground in turkey. i know one "data point" doesn't make the general case, but it doesn't sound like the turkish people are all that likely to be a good partner for the u.s., any time soon. living on your emotions is good for a thrill, but it always comes with a big pricetag. perfidy must be attoned for.

Posted by: cjm at June 4, 2005 7:28 PM

It never is.

Posted by: oj at June 4, 2005 7:40 PM

karma's a bitch.

ivan boesky and michael milkan did hard time.

Posted by: cjm at June 4, 2005 9:29 PM
« CLASS ACT: | Main | OR THEY COULD LISTEN TO THE PRESIDENT: »