June 27, 2005

DO CORPSES MEND?

How will these bruises mend? (Judy Dempsey, JUNE 27, 2005, International Herald Tribune)

The decades-long special relationship between Washington and Berlin was punctured during the run-up to the U.S.-led attack on Iraq when Schröder used his opposition to American policy in his campaign to be re-elected in October 2002.

Even after his election victory, Schröder kept up the rhetoric. Together with France and Russia, Germany formed the antiwar camp in Europe, causing some of the sharpest tensions and disagreements inside Europe and in the trans-Atlantic relationship for many years.

"Schröder had put himself in a corner over Iraq," said Kamp. "Bush does not forget easily."

But one man who has spent years trying to redefine and rescue the relationship between Washington and Berlin, says the tensions between both countries go well beyond personalities. They are about a fundamental shift in how the two countries perceive each other.

"It is always easy to see the relationship in terms of personalities," Karsten Voigt, Germany's special U.S. envoy said in an interview. "But the reality is that the German-American relationship is today a relationship operating in a different strategic environment."

"What we are living through is the birth pains of a new type of Atlanticism. In the old one, Germany was at the center of a global crisis which was the Cold War. We would have always been part of the action. Now we are in the center of an area of stability. Early on, we were a consumer of security. Now we are asked to be an exporter of security. We have to decide. We have global values but limited interests and limited military capabilities."

As part of this changing definition of Atlanticism, Voigt says the United States cannot afford to take its allies for granted.

They don't matter anymore but can't be taken for granted?

Posted by Orrin Judd at June 27, 2005 8:23 AM
Comments

"...Now we are in the center of an area of stability."

Is he that blind?

Posted by: Bartman at June 27, 2005 8:31 AM

We don't take Paraguay for granted yet we don't feel a need to consult them about everything we do either. The notion that Germany, which if anything has less force projection capacity and fewer economic prospects than Paraguay should be treated any differently is ridiculous.

Posted by: bart at June 27, 2005 8:54 AM

Too bad that some of us wasted time in high school and college studying this dying language.

Posted by: Lou Gots at June 27, 2005 9:06 AM

don't worry lou, there are still many historical works you can read in their native language.

Posted by: cjm at June 27, 2005 9:50 AM

who doesn't take Paraguay for granted?

Posted by: oj at June 27, 2005 9:58 AM

Lou,

German is still a valuable language if you work for a German company, or if you own German cookbooks. Also, there is probably no better language in the world for expressing real anger without the use of obscenities.

OJ,

American policy is not made with an eye towards whether Paraguay agrees with us, its foreign office is merely an irrelevance. The Germans are rapidly decaying into a similar position, if they aren't already there.

Posted by: bart at June 27, 2005 11:43 AM

Yes, their irrelevance is taken for granted.

Posted by: oj at June 27, 2005 11:48 AM

Paraguayans know that it's Uruguay that can be safely ignored.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at June 27, 2005 3:07 PM

German cookbooks?

Posted by: Tom at June 28, 2005 1:28 PM
« BECAUSE NOTHING MAKES A WORKFORCE MORE APPEALING TO INVESTORS THAN ITS NOT WORKING?: | Main | AIN'T THAT AMERICA: »