June 8, 2005
CONGRATULATIONS JUDGE BROWN
Judge Brown was confirmed 56-43. Thanks, Senator McCain, you're my hero.
MORE:
Liberals Rethinking Senate Filibuster Deal (Charles Babington June 8, 2005, Washington Post)
Democrats generally cheered, and Republicans groused, when a bipartisan group of senators crafted a compromise on judicial nominations last month. But with the Senate now confirming several conservative nominees whom Democrats had blocked for years, some liberals are questioning the wisdom of the deal and fretting about what comes next."Our problem with the compromise is the price that was paid," Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) said yesterday. She and other Congressional Black Caucus members plan to march into the Senate today to protest the impending confirmation of Janice Rogers Brown. [...]
"It looks like in some ways Frist is seizing the initiative," said Carl W. Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. Moreover, he said, liberals may be deluded in thinking the bipartisan deal will thwart another contentious nominee -- Brett M. Kavanaugh, the White House staff secretary -- who is not named in the two-page agreement. Two years ago, Bush nominated Kavanaugh, who helped independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr pursue the Monica S. Lewinsky case, to the D.C. Circuit appeals court.
"I think it's wishful thinking by the Democrats that he won't move forward," Tobias said. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said of Kavanaugh in an interview yesterday, "I intend to push him."
Yesterday, the Senate devoted itself entirely to Brown. Frist called her "a superb judge" who applies the law "without bias, without favor, with an even hand." Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), one of the 14 negotiators, called Brown "an extremely talented and qualified judge" who will "advance the cause of conservative judicial philosophy."
But Democrats recited a litany of Brown's controversial statements, including several from a 2000 speech titled "Fifty Ways to Lose Your Freedom." She said senior citizens "blithely cannibalize their grandchildren because they have a right to get as much 'free' stuff as the political system will permit them to extract." Elsewhere, Brown has said: "Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates. . . . When government advances . . . freedom is imperiled, civilization itself [is] jeopardized."
Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) told reporters that Brown is "one of the most extreme nominees that has ever come before the United States Senate in the 32 years I've been a senator."
And the Gang made her a federal judge. Posted by David Cohen at June 8, 2005 5:29 PM
Man, the Democrats really have it in for black and brown Republicans, huh?
Posted by: oj at June 8, 2005 5:43 PMThere are no black or brown Republicans -- or are you calling Howard Dean a liar?
Posted by: David Cohen at June 8, 2005 5:47 PMSo, does Biden's "most extreme" still fall short of the "extraordinary" threshold for filibustering in the future?
Not a chance.
I know, OJ. We're supposed to be thankful for what we DID get out of the deal. But I don't have to like it.
Posted by: John Resnick at June 8, 2005 6:37 PMIsn't it funny how Liberals get to "rethink" a deal while Conservatives could only "reneg" on a deal. Ah, it's so . . . what's the word I'm looking for here . . . . nuanced?
Posted by: John Resnick at June 8, 2005 6:40 PMlet's just wait until the fat lady sings, before we start popping the champagne corks. it is nice that the democrats are starting to mewl like babies, though.
Posted by: cjm at June 8, 2005 6:55 PMThe Gang of Seven didn't do anything for Justice Brown, all they did was throw Saad and Myers, and possibly Kavanaugh and others, under the bus. If they had voted for the rule change instead of working out the vainglorious "deal" Justice Brown and all of President Bush's other nominees would have been confirmed.
McCain will never win the Republican nomination, so you might as well stop shilling for him.
Posted by: Thom at June 8, 2005 7:22 PMOne of the glories of the story of America that, unfortunately, most Americans may too close to fully appreciate.
Fortunately, we dissident Canadians aren't so handicapped. Go, girl, go, Judge Brown.
Posted by: Peter B at June 8, 2005 8:24 PMI have to agree with Thom about Senator McCain. He is no friend to the Republican party and I would like to see all of Bush's nominees get votes, just like every other fairly elected president. If the Republican Congress doesn't pilot the ship, then soon the people's support will wain and the Democrats will take their turn at the helm.
Posted by: adolfo velasquez at June 8, 2005 8:32 PMI had her at a minimum of 65 votes. Any 56-vote winners want a book?
Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at June 8, 2005 9:40 PMWell I'll be darned. I figured that half the Dems would vote for her. Apparently the entire party figures it's better to appease the far left fundraising base and stick it to the black voting base (approximately 0% of whom would object to anything Judge Brown has ever said), rather than vice versa. Seems a strange choice to me, not that I mind them doing it...
Posted by: b at June 8, 2005 10:21 PMAgree with B - you'd think that some of the African American voters will see that all of the Dem Senators opposed her and reconsider their support for the Dems.
Posted by: AWW at June 8, 2005 10:52 PM