June 18, 2005
COME BACK, LAMARCK, ALL IS FORGIVEN:
The new science of race (CAROLYN ABRAHAM, June 18, 2005, Globe and Mail)
Henry Harpending is about to titillate the world's conspiracy theorists with one of the most politically incorrect academic papers of the new millennium.Why, he and his colleagues at the University of Utah asked, have Jews of European descent won 27 per cent of the Nobel Prizes given to Americans in the past century, while making up only 3 per cent of the population? Why do they produce more than half the world's chess champions? And why do they have an average IQ higher than any other ethnic group for which there's reliable data, and nearly six times as many people scoring above 140 compared with Europeans?
Prof. Harpending suggests that the reason is in their bloodline — it's genetic.
The 61-year-old anthropologist's explanation is not easily dismissed, but it crosses into the territory scientists fear most.
His group's theory is that during 1,000 years of persecution, social isolation and employment restrictions in Europe that kept Ashkenazi Jews from farming, they were forced into (then disreputable) jobs such as trade and finance, which demanded mental agility. Success in these fields could lead to food, shelter and family. Under such pressures, the paper suggests, genetic traits related to intelligence became more prevalent among central and northern European Jews.
Two U.S. journals refused the paper, an unusual experience for this widely published scholar. “We finally had to send the paper to England, where they're not so obsessed with political correctness,” Prof. Harpending said.
The danger of bolstering bigots is what has scientists so nervous. If a complex trait such as intelligence can be inherited, for instance, and you say one ethnic or racial group tends to have more of it than others, does it follow that another group has less? [...]
It was not supposed to be this way.
When the Human Genome Project was completed in 2000, its most touted result was that it showed no genetic basis for race. In fact, some scientists went so far as to dub race a “biological fiction.”
The project was a 13-year international drive to map all of the three billion chemical bits, or nucleotides, that make up human DNA. Particular nucleotide sequences (represented by the letters A, C, G and T) combine to form the estimated 25,000 genes whose proteins help to produce human traits, from the way your heart beats to the wave in your hair.
The map indicated that humans as a species are 99.9 per cent genetically identical — that, in fact, there are greater differences between two frogs in a pond than between any two people who find themselves waiting for a bus.
A teeny 0.1 per cent, a mere genetic sliver, helps to account for all the profound diversity within the human race, with its freckles, dimples, afros and crimson tresses, its shy and bombastic types, its Donald Trumps and Dalai Lamas, Madonnas and Mr. Dressups, Bill Gates, Billie Holidays, George W. Bushes and Osama bin Ladens.
It was a message of harmony: Hardly a hair of code separates us.
But five years later, one of scientists' main preoccupations has become to chart the genetic variations between and within racial groups — to parse that 0.1 per cent.
Make them do math and they develop mathematical minds. Posted by Orrin Judd at June 18, 2005 3:17 PM
They got the prizes because they award themselves prizes or strong armed others to do so.
How many have heard of the Catholic priest Georges Lemaitre? How many have heard of Einstein?(who said Lamaitre didn't know physics).
Posted by: David at June 18, 2005 4:42 PMEinstein, that momser.
Posted by: David Cohen at June 18, 2005 4:49 PMStockholm and Oslo are of course well-known centers of the Elders of Zion.(sarcasm intended)
Jewish academic success has precious little to do with genetics. Anyone who has ever been to a Hebrew school knows that there is no shortage of truly stupid Jews.
It does however have lots to do with culture. Just as with East Asian and Hindu kids, school is serious business and you are expected to achieve. Your academic success is the family's number 1 focus. If you aren't doing well, you can expect to suffer the consequences from punishment at home to opprobrium from the relatives, or the humiliation of needing tutoring. Academic success is rewarded.
My parents actually discouraged my participation in competitive sports until high school when my dad realized that colleges want kids to have some broader experience than mere academics. No Little League and Pop Warner but lots of music lessons and museum and zoo trips. My father could be quite disparaging of Jewish parents who insisted that their kids play Little League, join the Boy Scouts etc.
Posted by: bart at June 18, 2005 5:08 PMScientists who fear conclusions are not fully scientists at all, by definition. Sophists in scientistic clothing might be a more accurate description.
I didn't know this was still even arguable. If survival depended on intelligence, the intelligent survived and procreated. Over the years, the gene pool had more brains than brawn. No big mystery here.
Survival of the fittest whether in the Jewish and Asian communities or the snail darter. Isn't that what evolution teaches us. It's quite amusing when the left's pet theories come back to bite them.
Now they're trying to manually reverse the evolutionary process by affirmative action. We'll just sit back and see how that works out for them.
But it didn't/doesn't
Posted by: oj at June 18, 2005 8:02 PMMore than 3/4 of Jews voted for kerry. How smart could we be?
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at June 18, 2005 9:47 PMVoting for the Democrat is a reflex action, not a intellectual exercise. Jews have been conditioned to fear the Christian right. I've had this conversation many many times and never broken through the resistance.
Posted by: erp at June 18, 2005 10:12 PMIntelligence is the ability to use the rational facilities to overcome instinct.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at June 18, 2005 10:30 PMRobert:
No, tragically, intelligence is the ability to rationalize decisions already made instinctively.
OJ:
No, reward those who can do math and the group becomes better at it, at the expense of other things, if necessary. The mechanism isn't Lamarckian at all.
Posted by: Mike Earl at June 18, 2005 11:49 PMAnd passes it on, thus, Lamarckian.
Posted by: oj at June 19, 2005 12:08 AMThere's evidence that brain function can be improved by omega-3 fatty acids and the amino acide tyrosine.
In other words, the Jewish IQ is due to lox with cream cheese.
Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger at June 19, 2005 2:59 AMJoseph
Lox with cream cheese! You mean all that talk about it being due to gefilte fish was a joke and I've been gagging for nothing all these years? You guys have a very warped sense of humour.
Posted by: Peter B at June 19, 2005 7:20 AMmatt, I need no convincing. Growing up in NYC, most of my friends were Jews. My best friend for coming up to fifty years now and I have battled this out for decades. She votes Republican in local elections, but can't seem to get her hand to pull that lever for the Republican in national elections. I hope we both live long enough to see that happen.
On a bright note her son who is very succressful in the media, is a closet conservative and claims there are a lot more like him. Allah akbar.
BTW - I don't believe I've ever seen any numbers on how Asians vote. Now's a good time for the GOP to start targeting them, especially in California.
Peter: You don't think we really eat that stuff, do you? Yuck.
Posted by: David Cohen at June 19, 2005 9:51 AMI bought two bottles of gefilte fish for passover and could not bring myself to open them. If anybody wants them send me your mailing address.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at June 19, 2005 3:59 PMYou guys are trying to be funny (I hope), but this is very dangerous.
What Harpending and Orrin are preaching is the same deal that the Nazis preached -- the Jews, clever fellows, are running the world.
Somehow, though, they overlooked the fact (and it was a fact) that more German Jews were tailors than anything else. They weren't all mathematicians.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at June 19, 2005 4:01 PMActually, Harry, what Harpending is doing is trying to save evolutionary biology. You have no choice but to be on his side.
Posted by: David Cohen at June 19, 2005 6:18 PMDavid:
But even Harry can't be when he sees how idiotic his ideas are when carried to their logical ends.
Posted by: oj at June 19, 2005 6:21 PMthis is very dangerous
First, what are you doing making an argument from consequence, Harry? You're the scientist here, as you never tire of reminding us, so I should expect that's verboten for you -- wherever your technique leads you, there you must follow.
Second, thank you Captain Obvious! Science can have noxious side effects. Stab me.
Third, what are you doing blaming oj for the consequences of an idea that he rejects and you relentlessly promote?
Posted by: joe shropshire at June 19, 2005 11:02 PMIt's lousy science, because the initial concept, as I demonstrated with a reference to the German census (I'll get the reference if you need it, it was from a political science study of Nordhausen, though I cannot recall the author's name) was mistaken.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at June 19, 2005 11:11 PMIt's not science, just Darwinism. Require an accurate initial census and you have to toss every putative example of evolution.
Posted by: oj at June 19, 2005 11:14 PMPlease do. Amazing coincidence, that: science that points to conclusions you can't stomach is uniformly lousy science. Here's hoping your luck holds.
Posted by: joe shropshire at June 20, 2005 12:28 AMThe problem with Harpending's theory is its sloppiness. Any reasonably well-trained math geek will tell you that 'correlation does not mean causation.' He hasn't discussed culture as a prime motivator. Since phenotypical variation is the result of genetic AND environmental variation he might want to do that. Also, a study of the differences in achievement levels of the children of religious intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews or that of non-Jewish children adopted by Jewish parents in comparison to children of Jewish ancestry might prove valuable. In the US, the relevant sample sizes are certainly large enough to draw a satisfactory conclusion.
The notion that IQ remains static throughout one's life, as this study would require in order to have any probative value whatsoever, is pure hokum.
I doubt most German Jews were tailors but I have little doubt that most were in retail trade of various sorts whether tailoring or brokerage or baking. That is certainly true of Alsace until 1945. Today, most are professionals, but the community is less than 10% of its prewar size.
Robert,
I'm convinced that all the gefilte fish and fruitcake in the world will someday end up at Yucca Mountain.
I did not say most German Jews were tailors.
I said more were tailors than anything else.
There most likely is not a gene for being a tailor.
So much for Harpending.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at June 21, 2005 7:36 PMOf course there's no gene for it. Sic transit evolutionary psychology.
Posted by: oj at June 21, 2005 7:43 PM