May 27, 2005

WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE, CANADA?:

The Berlin-Baghdad Connection (ANDRÉS MARTINEZ, May 25, 2005, LA Times)

The world leader most responsible for the war in Iraq had a terrible weekend. I am not referring to George W. Bush or Saddam Hussein, though the Iraqi tyrant did make the front page in his underwear. [...]

[S]chroeder's recklessness on the global stage will be his real legacy. As the first German leader with no firsthand memory of life in the Third Reich, Schroeder asserted for a reunified Germany a more active role in world affairs. Within months of taking office, the dour but dapper chancellor had dispatched thousands of German peacekeepers to Kosovo as part of NATO's Balkan intervention. This was all as it should be. The Federal Republic, a model democracy for decades, had earned the right to cease thinking of itself as a nation on probation.

Schroeder's recklessness was triggered by the challenges of campaigning as a leftish reformer. Struggling in the polls a month before the last national election, in August 2002, Schroeder was the first world leader to stake out an absolutist position in advance of United Nations deliberations over Hussein's fate. Germany, the chancellor stated on the campaign trail, was in no mood for a "military misadventure" and would oppose any use of force against Iraq, regardless of what the U.N. decided. End of story.

Germany's own diplomats, led by popular Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer of the Green Party, were caught off guard by this campaign bravado and annoyed that Germany had preemptively removed itself from the debate. Bush's Texan swagger goes down poorly in Europe, and Schroeder's move to reply to it with some swagger of his own worked. The chancellor scored a come-from-behind win.

But at a terrible cost. The leader of a post-Cold War Germany has every right to disagree with Washington, but opportunistically doing so for the sake of scoring short-term political points was highly damaging to the cohesion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as well as to Germany's claim to be a nation endowed with a unique moral suasion.


Huh?

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 27, 2005 2:16 PM
Comments

"Germany's claim to be a nation endowed with a unique moral suasion"

Well..uh yes Germany has certainly effected the moral reasoning in the West.

Posted by: h-man at May 27, 2005 2:35 PM

germany does have a unique moral "suasion", just not the one they think.

Posted by: cjm at May 27, 2005 3:24 PM

Oy!

Posted by: Genecis at May 27, 2005 6:47 PM

h-man, cjm:

I suspect that 'suasion' popped up in one of those Reader's Digest-like linguistic exercises -- use-this-word-twice-a-day-every-day-for-a-week-and-it-becomes-a-permanent-part-of-your-vocabulary, and the author of the cited article needed another daily use of 'suasion' to drill it into his brain, never mind the context in which he used it.

Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at May 27, 2005 10:13 PM
« ROBBING HANS TO PAY JACQUES | Main | NAME THAT RELIGION: »