May 20, 2005
TWO BIRDS WITH ONE TOKEN (via Tom Morin):
How to Save the Subways—Before It’s Too Late (Nicole Gelinas, City Journal)
As New Yorkers learned in January, when a fire in a signal-relay room knocked out service for the half-million people who ride the A and C trains daily, Gotham’s subways are in deep trouble. Bad enough that the inferno showed that any bum (or terrorist) with a lighter could paralyze New York; worse still was New York City Transit chief Larry Reuter’s announcement that this critical lifeline for Brooklyn and Queens residents would be out for three to five years. When transit officials responded to riders’ outrage by getting most service up and running within two weeks, public relief mingled with anxiety that transit brass didn’t understand how their system worked or that they were responsible for keeping it going, no matter what.Perhaps most troubling of all was the revelation that this essential element of the region’s economy depends on fragile technology that predates the Great Depression. And further, though all this equipment desperately needs updating, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), the state agency that runs New York City Transit and the region’s commuter trains, doesn’t have the money to replace it or even maintain it properly, and will have even less wherewithal for vital infrastructure investments over the coming decade. The MTA faces bills now coming due for decades’ worth of poor operational and financial management—for which not just the bloated and clueless MTA but also Governor Pataki’s political leadership are ultimately to blame.
Below all these ills lies a still more fundamental problem, also the fruit of politics. State and local pols ensure that the price of a subway ride falls far short of the actual cost, but refuse to make up the difference with reliable subsidies. Meanwhile, the political clout of the Transport Workers Union (TWU) ensures that that cost is outrageous, thanks to lavish labor contracts and pension benefits. So the MTA, squeezed from both the cost and the revenue sides, runs chronic operating deficits that are about to become unsustainable.
Here’s why the numbers will never add up. The MTA will rake in $3.5 billion in mass-transit fares this year, plus $1.1 billion from its bridge-and-tunnel tolls. That $4.6 billion covers less than half the agency’s $9.4 billion in expenses. Correspondingly, the $2.8 billion in fares that 1.4 billion subway riders will pay this year is barely half of what it costs to run the trains. So dedicated taxes must provide a $2 billion dump into the MTA’s coffers each year. State and city subsidies add another $600 million, along with the bridge-and-tunnel profits. And it’s still not enough.
Just hike the tolls generally and charge a congestion fee during business hours. Posted by Orrin Judd at May 20, 2005 5:09 PM
Because nothing's so likely to improve an already overloaded system as dumping more people into it.
Posted by: David Cohen at May 20, 2005 8:45 PMAnd with inadequate past maintainance, increasing ridership will increase the number of breakdowns.
Posted by: jd watson at May 20, 2005 9:19 PMDon't forget that nothing makes a city's economy grow quite like raising the cost of working there.
Posted by: joe shropshire at May 20, 2005 9:23 PMIt's a government run enterprise,it can never be economically sound. It answers to interests which no business need be concerned with. You can tinker around the edges with peak and off peak fares and other changes although only one thing is certain: all increases in revenue will generate a corresponding increase in costs. Reducing services or privatizing the system are not options although the only real solutions.
Posted by: Tom C., Stamford, Ct. at May 20, 2005 10:07 PMLet the market set the fare. There's too many people in New York anyway.
Posted by: andy at May 20, 2005 11:53 PMNew York could boost subway revenues by modifying their Metrocard system to set fares based on time of day and distance travelled, the way they do on newer systems like Washington and San Francisco. The problem is the current $2 flat fare favors riders in the outer boroughs, who pay the same fee for their trips of up to 20 miles into Manhattan, while folks making trips of just 2-3 miles in Manhattan pay the same rate, whether its the middle of the rush hour or 3:30 in the morning. And while most of the money and power may be in Manhattan, most of the votes are in Brooklyn, Queens and The Bronx, so even proposing an adjustable fare would be political suicide.
Posted by: John at May 20, 2005 11:53 PMWhere's the infusion of Homeland Security money? Where's Hillary? Where's Schumer?
I guess trying to improve the subways is not as sexy as filibustering judges or just raiding some old fashioned pork. Enough federal money went into the Big Dig $14 billion, I believe) - now why can't NY grab some of that?
Posted by: jim hamlen at May 21, 2005 7:03 PMI'm so glad Houston doesn't come to a standstill when the little choo choos break down.
Ah, how great it is to live in the world's energy capital! :)
Posted by: kevin whited at May 21, 2005 10:44 PM