May 29, 2005

THEY'RE AWFULLY GOOD AT SURPRISES:

White House researching potential justices (Deb Riechmann, May 29, 2005, Associated Press)

The White House has laid the groundwork to place more conservatives on the Supreme Court, scrutinizing the backgrounds and legal views of a shrinking list of candidates amid speculation that ailing Chief Justice William Rehnquist soon will step down. [...]

"The vacancy could come anytime after this Memorial Day weekend, we think," said Sean Rushton, director of the conservative Committee for Justice, which has close ties to the White House counsel's office.

"They have been winnowing the list down for some time now. I imagine they're down to maybe three or five -- a handful anyway -- who are their first choices," he said.

White House officials say it is inappropriate to discuss filling a vacancy that does not exist. They refuse to disclose publicly any details about how Bush might pick the first nominee for the court in more than a decade.

But those tracking the process say the counsel's office has researched the resumes of prospective justices, their court opinions and their views about constitutional law. Justice Department lawyers are carefully looking into the personal backgrounds of possible nominees. Justice Clarence Thomas was confirmed despite allegations of sexual harassment. One of President Reagan's nominees, Douglas Ginsburg, withdrew from consideration after it was revealed that he had smoked marijuana.

John McGinnis, a law professor at Northwestern University and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department's office of legal counsel, said he thinks Bush already might have made up his mind.

"This White House -- I congratulate it on its ability to be secret," McGinnis said. "It's entirely possible that Rehnquist has already communicated his intention to step down and the White House has a plan absolutely set."


Is this entire story based on supposition?

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 29, 2005 2:06 PM
Comments

Even the 'the's and the 'and's are conjecture.

Posted by: Fred Jacobsen (San Fran) at May 29, 2005 2:38 PM

"Is this entire story based on supposition?"

Yup.

But what is true is that Rehquist is a very sick man. I wonder if the White House knows that I am available?

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at May 29, 2005 3:07 PM

The media's simply using the same template for speculating about Rhenquist's retirement and his successor that they did speculating about Pope John Paul II's impending death and his possible replacement (though I believe by law Bush cannot nominate Cardinal Ratzinger as the new Chief Justice...).

Posted by: John at May 29, 2005 4:33 PM

"though I believe by law Bush cannot nominate Cardinal Ratzinger as the new Chief Justice"

I do not think there is a law that requires a justice to be a citizen. The real problems are that he would be filibustered because of his views on abortion. BTW, he is in his 70s and is too old for an appointment to a life time slot.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at May 29, 2005 5:19 PM

A Ratzinger appointment would be amusing anyway. Would he give up his day job? Could be a tough commute holding both.

Posted by: pj at May 29, 2005 9:26 PM

"Is this entire story based on supposition?"

It's from the AP - aren't all their stories?

Posted by: obc at May 29, 2005 10:25 PM

How, if Bush is smart, he'll make his #1 pick the least conservative of the list. And leak the list, so that the Dems know full well that if they reject the 1st one, the next one(s) will be even worse (from their point of view).

Posted by: ray at May 29, 2005 11:00 PM

obc;

No, sometimes the AP publishes contra-factuals and stuff that's flat out made up. Speculation is actually the higher level of accuracy.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at May 31, 2005 5:25 PM
« RIGHT CONTINENT, WRONG BILLION: | Main | ONE IS PLENTY: »