May 2, 2005

PUSH WHEN THEY TEETER:

Anti-Japan protests may signal power struggle (Bennett Richardson, 5/03/05, Asia Times)

Anti-Japan violence, statements and other developments in China suggest the recent political situation in Beijing has been less stable than outward appearances indicate and that a hidden power struggle may have occurred during the past few weeks of unrest.

State-run newspapers in China have recently suggested that the anti-Japan riots across the country are part of a plot to destabilize the Chinese leadership, and have taken pains to emphasize the conciliatory tone of Chinese President Hu Jintao during a recent meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi on the sidelines of the Asia-Africa summit in Jakarta.

The official Xinhua news agency reported that Hu made an unusually accommodating "apology to the past leaders of both countries" for the recent breakdown in relations when he met with Koizumi. Analysts say this sharp contrast with the harsh criticism of Japan by officials in mid-April suggests a schism exists between the upper levels of political leadership in Beijing, who are seeking warmer ties with Japan, and other elements in the Communist Party who wish to keep Tokyo at a distance.

"Past mass demonstrations have always had a political power struggle element to them," says Ryosei Kokubun, director of the Institute of East Asian Studies at Keio University in Tokyo. He says that a similar crisis could be occurring within the Chinese government: on the one side, with Hu and and his ally Premier Wen Jibao, and on the other, less progressive elements within the party who encouraged the anti-Japan riots as a method of causing social unrest.


It would be a good time to enbarrass them over their failure to deal with their North Korean allies and to ditch the One China policy.

Posted by Orrin Judd at May 2, 2005 6:54 AM
Comments

I would hesitate about 'ditching the one China policy' at the present time. It is in our national interest for the centrifugal forces always present in China to become stronger rather than weaker. If there is one thing that all Chinese on the Mainland pretty much agree on, it is that Taiwan is the 'rebellious 22d province.'

That of course doesn't mean that we shouldn't hint loudly that we support whatever course of action the elected government of Taiwan would choose.

Posted by: bart at May 2, 2005 11:14 AM

Who cares what they want?

Posted by: oj at May 2, 2005 11:54 AM

Do you want to risk the negative impact on the world economy of a war which would result in the destruction of the PRC?

Posted by: bart at May 3, 2005 8:55 AM

Yes

Posted by: oj at May 3, 2005 8:57 AM

Don't own any stock do you? Don't buy any discounted retail products then? Not worried about inflation or interest rates going through the moon then?

IOW, that makes one of you.

Posted by: bart at May 3, 2005 10:04 AM

Bart:

World war? Are you saying the EU and the Russians will fight on China's side?

Posted by: jim hamlen at May 3, 2005 10:34 AM

The implosion of China will be deflationary.

Posted by: oj at May 3, 2005 10:56 AM

jim:

It's too much to be hoped.

Posted by: oj at May 3, 2005 11:08 AM

The world economy is dependent in large part upon the ability of the PRC to produce cheap goods for consumer markets. If the PRC were destroyed that would end. The accompanying inflation would be a disaster.

That is not even counting the kind of damage the PRC could impose on the US with its ICBMs.

Posted by: bart at May 4, 2005 2:32 PM

There's always more cheap labor.

Posted by: oj at May 4, 2005 2:36 PM
« DID HE EVER READ THE BOOK?: | Main | EVEN THE A.T.: »