May 21, 2005

LET TAXES SHAPE BEHAVIOR:

Bike commuters sail past soaring costs at gas pumps (Kevin Grasha, 5/20/05, Lansing State Journal)

When gas prices soared above $2 a gallon last May and some of his co-workers started to complain and formulate end-of-the-world scenarios, Mike Cox barely noticed.

The senior project manager for the state's Department of Environmental Quality has been riding his Trek to work for three years.

Three to five days a week, the 50-year-old Cox pedals 11 miles to and from his Okemos home, on a 21-gear bike with mahogany fenders and a headlamp.

The journey, mostly traversing major streets with bike lanes, including Kalamazoo Street, takes 47 minutes in the morning and 54 minutes coming home.

It's an efficient use of time, he said. "I do my workout and my commute at the same time."


Posted by Orrin Judd at May 21, 2005 11:17 AM
Comments

I've been riding my bike to work almost exclusively for 3 years now. Not because of the price of gas, but because the roads here in Minneapolis have too many cars on them, driven by too many idiots. 8 of the 10 miles I ride is bike path.

The availability of mass-produced snow-studded bicycle tires (search biketiresdirect.com if you're interested) has even made the winter commute plausible. I'd rather ride when it's 20 degrees and snowing than 40 degrees and raining. This spring has been sort of drag, but every time I take the car I regret it. You sort of get addicted to the ride.

Posted by: ted welter at May 21, 2005 12:00 PM

I envy you guys, but alas, for myself it would be logistically impossible. If oj gets his way I suppose my wife and I will need to seperate and move closer to our respective jobs so we can ride our bikes. "Live Free or Die" used to be a state motto somewhere, right? Is it applicable to elitist social engineering projects as well?

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford, Ct. at May 21, 2005 12:08 PM

As if any of us needed evidence that the power to tax is the power to coerce and destroy.

The public transportations Nazis (Notice: no apologies) will not rest until they convert the rest of us, by coercive means, of course, into umbrella-carrying, Euro-weenie like, soccer-watchers, meekly standing around waiting for the bus.

Fortunately, the rest of still hear the motormusic, as the tanks roll forward, and the aircraft stand for the gates of the sun.

Posted by: Lou Gots at May 21, 2005 12:32 PM

I keep seeing the gas tax presented in terms of personal transportation, but what about the cost of shipping and transporting goods? A gas tax would go right into the cost of milk, etc, too.

Posted by: mike beversluis at May 21, 2005 12:33 PM

As if any of us needed evidence that the power to tax is the power to coerce and destroy.

The public transportations Nazis (Notice: no apologies) will not rest until they convert the rest of us, by coercive means, of course, into umbrella-carrying, Euro-weenie like, soccer-watchers, meekly standing around waiting for the bus.

Fortunately, the rest of still hear the motormusic, as the tanks roll forward, and the aircraft stand for the gates of the sun.

Posted by: Lou Gots at May 21, 2005 12:33 PM

Never has "tanks roll" sounded more apt.

Posted by: oj at May 21, 2005 1:09 PM

mike:

If shipped by truck.

Posted by: oj at May 21, 2005 1:10 PM

Lou Gots, dude, calm down before you blow a gasket!

I'd rather rely on my legs to get me around instead of being a prisoner of traffic jams, working for my car, and gas prices. Not to mention the better physical shape I'd be in than someone who drives everywhere. To me, that is being free.

P.S. I've never had a driver's license and I've managed to survive for 33 years! In four different countries! *gasp*

Posted by: chaoticmuse at May 21, 2005 1:17 PM

While we're at it, let's require the bicyclists to be licensed to use those roads, as well as paying licensing fees for their vehicles. (After all, the gax tax is a user fee that is supposed to be only for roads, but gets raided for the general fund and even bike trails which cars can't use. So quit whining about subsidized cars, or don't buy anything that used a truck for transportation.)

Let's enforce the traffic laws when it comes to bicyclists behavior, too. Things like blocking traffic, and slower vehicles yielding and keeping right, and signaling turns and in general, not acting like overgrown children so stupid that they want to play in traffic.

And didn't you realize that the new New Hampshire motto is "Live My Way or Die!"?

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at May 21, 2005 1:20 PM

Does Mike Cox need a shower after pedaling 11 miles to work? Or does he share his workout with his co-workers the rest of the day?

Posted by: John J. Coupal at May 21, 2005 1:40 PM

Regarding taxes and traffic laws: I have no objection to bike trail user fees, especially if it would result in more bicycle route options around town. Many of the recreational trails around Minnesota and Wisconsin already require tags, so it wouldn't be unprecedented. As far as traffic laws go, I see a many more automobile violations in a typical commute than I see commuting cyclists breaking laws. Drivers don't respect crosswalks or bike lanes around here, and do not give you the 3 feet required by local ordinance when passing (usually to hurry up so they can stop at red light up ahead).

The only exception is, if it's raining or 28 below zero, I'm not standing around very long at a red light if there is no cross traffic and no cop.

As far as the shower issue goes, if it's really hot in the morning, I have a change of clothes in my bag, and a head dowsing and pitstop wash in the standard bathroom takes care of the B.O. problem. I keep my hair short for this reason.

Posted by: ted welter at May 21, 2005 2:07 PM

Raoul:

The bike riders aren't wielding enormous weapons that most of them are incompetent to operate.

Posted by: oj at May 21, 2005 2:53 PM

Tom:

Freedom is just choices. Choosing to drive no matter the cost is certainly an option.

Posted by: oj at May 21, 2005 3:42 PM

I considered exercising for my commute, the trouble is you end up all sweaty and smelly at work. Lucky for him he has a government job.

Posted by: pj at May 21, 2005 5:29 PM

I used to walk. You don't get very sweaty.

Posted by: oj at May 21, 2005 5:45 PM

Try walking to work in the South on a summer day, paste boy.

Posted by: ratbert at May 21, 2005 6:49 PM

Actually, now that actual evidence is starting to replace anecdotal evidence, what we're learning is that the recent increase in the price of gas had almost no effect on people's behavior.

Posted by: David Cohen at May 21, 2005 7:09 PM

Yes, it was far too minimal. We can jack the heck out of taxes.

Posted by: oj at May 21, 2005 7:15 PM

I used to walk a mile to work when I lived in Chicago years ago. In the winter I had to worry about frostbite and hypothermia from the wind chill, in the summer dehydration from the heat and humidity.

Since then, I've tried to keep my commute as short as possible. Anyone who spends an hour on a commute, one-way (whether car or bike), is a first class fool. That's two hours (8% of a day) of one's life wasted, workout or not.

Yep, seen my share of stupid driving too, but considering there are a lot more drivers than bicyclists, that makes the percentage of stupidity from the latter much higher.

As for incompetent and destructive operators, ("most of them"?) it's not for a lack of trying or lack of desire, as anyone who's spent any amount of time walking on a hiking/biking trail will quickly come to discover. (Then again, like with the bicyclist on a road, maybe I just get to see more opportunites for bicycle stupidity, I guess...)

And if the increase gas prices had no effect, they why do the social engineers keep promoting such effects as their primary benefit? ("get people out of their cars.") It's just another sin tax, and like all good prudes, they just want to make a profit off of other people's vices. But never their own, you'll notice. The next person to say "raise taxes on X to cause me to stop me from buying/using X " will be the first.

Tell, you what, let's only impose these higer gas taxes and all your other transportation prescriptions in the Eastern Time Zone. That way you get to enjoy them, and most of the rest of use won't have to. (And in a few years, EST will only be observed in a few counties in New England. and in Canada..)

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at May 21, 2005 7:23 PM

raoul:

I was in Chicago too. Of course, if I took the El I fell asleep and ended up in Evanston everytime.

Posted by: oj at May 21, 2005 10:27 PM

rat:

I'm assured by excellent sources that you evolve to suit the climate...

Posted by: oj at May 21, 2005 10:28 PM

No offense to anyone above but the guy who would ride into work a few days week would really stink even after showering. Telecommuting rather than biking.

Posted by: AWW at May 22, 2005 12:30 AM

Contrary to what oj says, everything shipped is on a truck at some point in the journey.

Posted by: andy at May 22, 2005 11:38 AM

Needn't be for long.

Posted by: oj at May 22, 2005 12:17 PM

When I was there, you had to change trains to get to Evanston, at Addison(?) or some such northside station. (One of the first computer stores, "the itty bitty machine company", was located in Evanston.) So falling alseep and ending up there was quite a feat. You sure it wasn't the Jackson Park station? I did get halfway to O'Hare once by mistake...

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at May 22, 2005 2:37 PM

Orrin's against cities, against cars and against small populations.

I cannot quite make that work out.

Bike commuters are the world's most boring people and they dress funny and smell bad.

Although I spend part of my day in an air-conditioned room in front of a computer, other parts are spent doing stuff. I'll take Orrin seriously when I see some carless geek walking or biking home with a bale of peatmoss.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 22, 2005 4:09 PM

Automoblies are perfect for such limited purposes. But not for regular commuting.

Posted by: oj at May 22, 2005 4:43 PM

"I used to walk. You don't get very sweaty."

Speak for yourself. When we lived in Manhattan, during the previous millenium, I walked to work. About 3 miles from 107st to 48St. if it was at all warm I was drenched. I would carry a clean shirt and change in my office. One day my boss used his pass key to unlock the door while I was changing. It was the beginning of the end for me.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at May 22, 2005 9:26 PM

I encourage all of you to walk or bike to work. That will reduce the congestion on the highways, enhancing my own driving experience.

Posted by: J Baustian at May 23, 2005 12:46 AM

Harry writes:

"Although I spend part of my day in an air-conditioned room in front of a computer, other parts are spent doing stuff. I'll take Orrin seriously when I see some carless geek walking or biking home with a bale of peatmoss."

How 'bout pulling a kayak rigged for fishing so he can stop at the lake and catch dinner? It's not that I'm against cars (wish global warming would kick in up here, big time)--the bike is a faster method of transport in this city for trips of 10 miles or less, especially during rush hour. It's less boring than sitting in a traffic jam and listening to bad talk radio.

And some of the most boring people that *I know are atheists.

Posted by: ted welter at May 23, 2005 8:07 AM

Cars are to roads as tin cans are to tin can openers.

Without cars, you don't get roads.

If we use cars much less than we do now, the roads will fall apart.

The only mobile societies have used either cars or horses. Nothing else works.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at May 24, 2005 7:01 PM

We use cars a lot and the roads are falling apart--though bridges are even worse. When you let people use public infrastructure but don't make them pay the costs it's disastrous.

Posted by: oj at May 24, 2005 7:44 PM

oj-

The irresponsible behavior exists almost solely on the side of the custodians of the maintainence funding. The users pay while the so-called custodians squander. It's called politics. The beauty of trust funds, 'authorities' and commissions etc.,etc., is their ability to isolate themselves to a large degree from the consequences of their irresonsible behavior. It's a politicians dream.

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford, Ct. at May 25, 2005 7:53 AM

They don't pay what they cost.

Posted by: oj at May 25, 2005 8:01 AM

By your definition of 'cost'. BTW how the heck do you know?

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at May 25, 2005 10:32 AM

gas taxes, etc. don't cover even just the cost of the Federal Highway bills.

Posted by: oj at May 25, 2005 10:57 AM

Bills or bills (small b)? What percentage of the funding for the fiasco up in Boston was federal? Is the amount growing? How much do you believe was wasted by mismanagement or political expediency?

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at May 25, 2005 12:42 PM

None was wasted. That's just what you get for building roadways.

Posted by: oj at May 25, 2005 2:35 PM

Mere blather. That's what one gets with the state operating outside of it's competence.

Posted by: Tom C., Stamford,Ct. at May 25, 2005 3:12 PM

Exactly. Privatize the roads and make drivers pay their way.

Posted by: oj at May 25, 2005 3:19 PM
« THE DISCIPLINE OF DEMOCRACY: | Main | OBLIGATORY NAZI APOLOGY: »