May 22, 2005
I'M THINKING OF TAKING UP SMOKING
Scientists Say Sunshine May Prevent Cancer (Marilynn Marchione, AP, 5/21/05)
Scientists are excited about a vitamin again. But unlike fads that sizzled and fizzled, the evidence this time is strong and keeps growing. If it bears out, it will challenge one of medicine's most fundamental beliefs: that people need to coat themselves with sunscreen whenever they're in the sun. Doing that may actually contribute to far more cancer deaths than it prevents, some researchers think.The great thing about science, we're told, is the way it corrects it's errors. And corects them. And correct's them. And corrects tem. and corrects them. And currects them. And corrects hem. And corrects them And korrects them. And correts them. Amd corrects them. And collects them. Posted by David Cohen at May 22, 2005 12:11 AMThe vitamin is D, nicknamed the "sunshine vitamin" because the skin makes it from ultraviolet rays. Sunscreen blocks its production, but dermatologists and health agencies have long preached that such lotions are needed to prevent skin cancer. Now some scientists are questioning that advice. The reason is that vitamin D increasingly seems important for preventing and even treating many types of cancer.
In the last three months alone, four separate studies found it helped protect against lymphoma and cancers of the prostate, lung and, ironically, the skin. The strongest evidence is for colon cancer.
It's probably a "moderation in all things" issue.
We need sunlight; too much is too much.
Those who have had several bad sunburns are more prone to skin cancer.
David, aren't you being ssomewhat discursive here? (In reference to a previous comment by Orrin)
Posted by: jd watson at May 22, 2005 5:19 AMVery clever commentary, O.
Posted by: Dorothy Judd at May 22, 2005 7:23 AMMrs Judd:
I am sorely reluctant to deprive the overworked Orrin of a mother's praise, but as David (either graciously or triumphantly--I'm never quite sure)ensures I get full credit/blame for my efforts, I must point out the brilliance is his.
Posted by: Peter B at May 22, 2005 8:13 AMAs a general rule, scientific results less than a century old should be regarded as tentative.
Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger at May 22, 2005 8:06 PMAll though it may gall you ( as it does me), Woody Allen was spot on 30 years ago in Sleeper. Everything they claim is bad for you is good for you and vice versa.
Just remember Hitler was a Vegitarian.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at May 22, 2005 8:58 PM