April 3, 2005
WHAT DUTCH?:
The new Dutch model?: Increasingly, the Netherlands wonders whether diversity is always desirable (The Economist, Mar 31st 2005)
FOR people who see themselves as the front line in an uncertain struggle to defend western civilisation—a struggle, moreover, which has already cost some lives—the cultural warriors of the Netherlands have a surprising spring in their step. “I see developments in the Arab world as very promising,” says Paul Scheffer, a journalist who is one of the leaders of an ideological movement that wants to counter Islamist extremism by putting more emphasis on the rule of law and less on accommodating differences.Taking his cue from America's political right, he hails the fact that in some Middle Eastern countries ordinary people have challenged old elites and theocracies. In Europe, he reckons, traditional leaders who presume to speak for Muslim immigrants have it too easy, because governments pander to them out of a misplaced respect for cultural diversity.
“The very idea of a multi-cultural society is too conservative, because it denies the fact that the migration changes people,” says Mr Scheffer, a veteran of Amsterdam's bohemian, canalside intelligentsia, a world where the right to be eccentric, and to change, is held dear. He and his friends have been arguing that all would-be citizens of the Netherlands must be presented with a clear message. As the price of living in an open, law-governed society, they should acknowledge the right of others to individual choice, dissent and “apostasy” from the beliefs of their own community.
In some European countries, such language might sound intolerant. But in the Netherlands of 2005, it has entered the political mainstream. Nor are all its advocates of European background. Indeed, its strongest advocate of all, Ayaan Hirsi Ali has a personal history which, in many people's eyes, gives her a unique authority to speak about the dark side of religious fundamentalism. What she, Mr Scheffer and, in a different way, the maverick politician Geert Wilders—who recently left the centre-right Liberals to form a new, Eurosceptical party—all have in common is a sense, bordering on arrogance, that history is on their side.
Nice to have History on your side, better to have demographics. The future of Holland is as a tolerant Islamic society. Posted by Orrin Judd at April 3, 2005 9:21 PM
Tolerant + islamic = ultimate oxymoron...
Posted by: M. Murcek at April 4, 2005 2:48 AMEUthenasia?
Posted by: Barry Meislin at April 4, 2005 10:31 AMNothing is inevitable and History seldom moves in a linear fashion.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at April 4, 2005 10:40 AMHolland will be the first spot where the West finally gets up the gumption to pull up the gangplank on the Muslim savages. Their social structure is entirely unsustainable with the invasion of millions of underclass Maghrebins.
If the Dutch really need labor, there is always Eastern Europe, India and Thailand.
Posted by: bart at April 4, 2005 11:21 AMAh, yes, the brave Dutch...
Posted by: oj at April 4, 2005 11:53 AMThe Dutch may be tolerant, but their guests aren't. The smart ones, seeing the handwriting on the wall, are already leaving. Those who stay, like the Jews who stayed in Germany too long, will regret they didn't leave when they had the chance.
Holland's only hope is that Bush is able to disarm and defuse Islamic terrorism so in their future dealing with fanatic Muslims, at least they won't be armed.
The Dutch did throw out the Spanish, who while every bit as vicious, grasping, bigoted and mind-bendingly ignorant as the Jihadists were, were better armed and organized than they were. Maybe they can channel the spirit of William the Silent.
Posted by: bart at April 4, 2005 4:57 PM