April 16, 2005
TIME FOR A MENTAL HEALTH MONTH
Sick leave crisis hits social services (Katherine Demopoulos, The Guardian, April 15th, 2005)
Some 20,000 local authority social services staff were signed off sick for two months or more last year, according to a new survey of English councils.The figure, which represents around 9% of the total number of staff in social services departments, highlights the crisis plaguing these departments, many of which struggle to find employees to fill posts.
Staff complain of large workloads and high stress levels, which public sector Unison said were major causes of sickness absence. [...]
Additionally, the figures reveal that social services staff take significantly more sick leave than other areas of both the public and private sectors.
Government statistics published last November showed that civil servants took an average two weeks' sick leave a year, costing £368m. This is roughly double that of the private sector, according to Richard Dodd, spokesman for the Confederation of British Industry.
Larger organisations tend to have worse absence levels, he said, which is one reason why local authorities are hit hard. He said one crucial element in reducing absenteeism seems to be "having senior management involvement in managing absence. So this is better in a small organisation."
There are several laws at work here, all combining to make government social work the ultimate morale and spirit crusher. The first is that many unsupervised employees with generous sick and disability benefits will use them in complete (and defiant) good faith and with the general assistance of the medical profession. The second is that anyone who sets out on a career to “help people” had better be prepared for a lot of abuse and disappointment. The third is that morale problems increase proportionately as the number of employees in any organization grows beyond seven.
Posted by Peter Burnet at April 16, 2005 8:39 AMFourth point: those who go into the liberal "helping" professions are prone to an eliteist worldview in which they consider themselves members of a better class of people than those they serve. (See, e.g., John Kerry; Howard Dean.) Those who fall prey to this kind of thinking often end up with a sense of entitlement that rationalizes gaming the sick-leave system, as well as a contempt for their clients that drives them to get away from the office at every opportunity.
Posted by: Mike Morley at April 16, 2005 9:14 AMFifth Point: If those in the liberal "helping" professions actually help people, they eventually work themselves out of a job.
Sixth Point: They're all good union members and know that they're working for the good of the union, not the good of their employers or their customers/clients/patients.
Posted by: erp at April 16, 2005 11:26 AMA great many folks in the public sector "helping professions" burn out quickly ... and sometimes repeatedly ... from frustration and disillusionment. The ones who hang in there often survive by developing a very thick emotional skin. And it's those desensitized types who eventually make it into management positions.
Posted by: ghostcat at April 16, 2005 1:38 PM