April 21, 2005

OUR WORST MOMENTS IN THIS WAR HAVE BROUGHT OUT OUR BEST:

Soldier Convicted for Attacking Fellow Troops (Estes Thompson, April 21, 2005, The Associated Press)

An Army sergeant was convicted Thursday by a military jury of premeditated murder and attempted murder in a grenade and rifle attack that killed two of his comrades and wounded 14 others in Kuwait during the opening days of the Iraq war.

Hasan Akbar, 34, now faces a possible death penalty, which the 15-member jury will consider at a hearing that begins Monday.

Prosecutors say Hasan Akbar, 33, told investigators he launched the attack because he was concerned U.S. troops would kill fellow Muslims in Iraq. They said he coolly carried out the attack to achieve "maximum carnage" on his comrades in the 101st Airborne Division. [...]

Killed in the middle-of-the-night attack were Army Capt. Christopher Seifert, 27, who was shot in the back, and Air Force Maj. Gregory Stone, 40, who suffered 83 shrapnel wounds. The 101st was preparing to move into Iraq in support of the U.S. invasion when the attack occurred in March 2003.

"Sgt. Akbar executed that attack with a cool mind," prosecutor Capt. Robert McGovern said during closing arguments, cocking Akbar's unloaded M-4 rifle and pulling the trigger twice for emphasis. "He sought maximum carnage."

The prosecutor said Akbar planned carefully and stole grenades that would achieve maximum destruction in the brigade command section of Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait.


That was a really scary moment, on its surface seemingly raising the possibility that there could be a Fifth Column within the U.S. and most importantly its military. What's most notable is how calmly we reacted to it. Imagine the reprisals that would have followed in most other times and places? Heck, FDR launched reprisals against the Nisei and none of them had done anything wrong.

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 21, 2005 8:52 PM
Comments

Do you suppose they might let the firing squad use mortars?

Posted by: Axel Kassel at April 21, 2005 9:10 PM

His trial should have been held immediately at the edge of the battlefield, as would have been the case in prior wars.

Posted by: George at April 22, 2005 12:31 AM

Very interesting trial. The penalty phase, of course will be the more important part. The civilian defense counsel approach might be to play the Muslim card, but in a CM that makes the act partake more of mutiny and treason.

Posted by: Lou Gots at April 22, 2005 8:28 AM

Why the surprise? We really are a country ruled by law, and I hope he is punished "to the full extent of the law."

Posted by: erp at April 22, 2005 9:14 AM

2 years too late .. I still can't figure out why he wasn't shot at dawn the next day.

Posted by: JonofAtlanta at April 22, 2005 9:51 AM

Yeah- due process is always such a downer. :)

Granted, being in a war zone probably mitigates due process to some degree...but whatever, at the very least he'll spend the rest of his life at Ft. Leavenworth making small rocks out of big ones.

Posted by: Noel Erinjeri at April 22, 2005 7:30 PM
« PARTY TIME: | Main | WE NEED MORE BUREAUCRATS...: »