April 18, 2005
CLUELESS:
Democrats search for a party path: The party has failed to convert a recent string of Republican stumbles to its own gain. (Linda Feldmann, 4/19/05, The Christian Science Monitor)
Life in the political wilderness can be tough. Some Republicans here still know what that's like - though at this point, 10-plus years after Newt Gingrich & Co. swept the Democrats out of power on Capitol Hill, a majority of House GOP members have no firsthand experience of being in the minority.Democrats, in fact, are counting on those dwindling numbers to help them as they look for that right combination of message, candidates, infrastructure, and opposition stumbles - with a dash of opposition hubris - to win back their mojo in 2006, if not 2008. So far, the party in power has obliged on that last score: House GOP leader Tom DeLay is under siege over ethics. President Bush faces an uphill climb with his No. 1 domestic priority, remaking Social Security. A majority of Americans objected to Congress and Bush turning the Terri Schiavo tragedy into a federal case.
But Democrats aren't gaining from the other side's losses. Polls show the GOP congressional leadership is less popular than the president - but the Democratic leadership fares still worse. And even among rank-and-file Democrats, only 56 percent approve of their own congressional leadership, according to the Pew Research Center. Among Republicans, the analogous number is 76 percent.
Bottom line: It's hard to project power when you're out of power.
There's your Democratic platform:
(1) Against what's-his-face
(2) Against Social Security reform
(3) For killing the sick
Posted by Orrin Judd at April 18, 2005 11:50 PMAt least when the Republicans were in the minority, they would make some type of proactive proposals, or would push one porposed by the White House if a Republican was there. The plans would be DOA once they got into Congress, but the current Democratic leadership seems to think the filibuster is the highest form of legislative achievement they can aspire to, and that the voters will reward their obstinance beginning with the 2006 elections, even if they never make a substatantive proposal on any major issue.
Posted by: John at April 19, 2005 12:11 AMDon't forget the unborn.
Posted by: Jim in Chicago at April 19, 2005 12:55 AM