April 16, 2005

AFRO-BRAZILIAN POPE:

African Catholics Seek a Voice to Match Their Growing Strength (Robyn Dixon, April 16, 2005, LA Times)

A fierce competition for souls is on in Lagos. In this sprawling capital that seems glued together out of scraps of rusted iron, plywood and torn posters, the immortal combat is being waged on faded billboards so closely planted along the highway that it's difficult to make them out as they flash by: Divine Harvest! Holy Fire! Winners Chapel! Victorious Family! Champions Chapel! Miracle Explosion!

None of the posters is for the Roman Catholic Church, which is growing faster in Africa than anywhere else. Father George Ehusani, secretary-general of the Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria, hardly needs to advertise, when the church's biggest challenge is not attracting people but dealing with the growth.

The number of African Catholics has increased 30% in a decade, to more than 130 million, served by 426 bishops and more than 27,000 priests. In Nigeria, with about 25 million Catholics in a population of about 137 million, congregations spill out onto benches outside most Catholic, churches, even with five or six Masses on Sundays.

The phenomenal growth brings ambitions, and not only for an African pope when the College of Cardinals convenes next week. Catholics here are also eager to dispatch a wave of African priests, generally conservative, to an increasingly secular Europe and United States, just as white missionaries once arrived on African shores.

Their time, these Africans believe, has come.


Regardless of who's chosen, he shouldn't have trouble figuring out where his focus should be and what the most important problem is: more clergy.

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 16, 2005 7:48 AM
Comments

Sheesh. Don't you think the most pressing issue for African Christianity would be to prevent more Rwanda-style massacres?

Posted by: Harry Eagar at April 16, 2005 2:12 PM

Why?

Posted by: oj at April 16, 2005 5:36 PM

"Why?"

Well you know, like continuing slaughters of millions, might give the church a bad reputation. Not to mention the loss of "bingo" revenues.

Posted by: h-man at April 17, 2005 7:08 AM

h:

It never has.

Posted by: oj at April 17, 2005 9:25 AM

Well, it ought to.

The Rwandan massacres, which were the most efficient (that is, killed the largest proportion of the target population in the least time), were a Christian deal.

No doubt Tom C. will allege that they were all darwinists, but the fact is, they were Christians, killing with their preachers at the head.

More clergy is the last thing Africa needs.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at April 17, 2005 5:08 PM

Harry:

"ought"? Good one.

Posted by: oj at April 17, 2005 5:47 PM
« FBI? OR FBI?: | Main | THEIR PROBLEM: »