March 31, 2005

WHY HAS [STORY] GIVEN US...:

Cracking the Story Code: There are seven basic plots that tell the human tale. (Christopher Booker, March 31, 2005, LA Times)

One of the greatest mysteries in our lives lies so close beneath our noses that we don't even recognize it to be a mystery. Why do we tell stories? Why has evolution given us the ability to conjure up these sequences of imaginary happenings, on which, through movies, novels, plays, TV soaps and comic strips, we spend so much of our lives?

Posted by Orrin Judd at March 31, 2005 2:02 PM
Comments

For those of you who ask, this is what I mean by Darwinism.

Posted by: David Cohen at March 31, 2005 2:12 PM

I once heard a lecture by Kurt Vonneghut, who held that there were only three basic plots: Horatio Alger (what the article calls "Rags to Riches"), Snow White ("Rebirth"), and Kafka's Metamorphosis--the latter being something of an outlier.

Posted by: Mike Morley at March 31, 2005 2:42 PM

How can there be any plot for random events?

Posted by: Luciferous at March 31, 2005 4:08 PM

David -

Too cryptic. Please elucidate.

Posted by: ghostcat at March 31, 2005 5:13 PM

Mike:

That seems to leave out Finding Nemo, doesn't it?

In Durant's History of Civilization, he quoted one of the Classic Greeks as saying there are (I think) 32 basic plots

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at March 31, 2005 5:30 PM

"Finding Nemo" is two of the seven interwoven. Marlin is on a Quest to find Nemo, who has embarked upon a Voyage and Return.

Posted by: ted welter at March 31, 2005 5:35 PM

C.S. Lewis put forth a similar theory about recurring stories iirc in On Stories. Of course he delineated them along the lines of myth though.

Posted by: Shelton at March 31, 2005 6:03 PM

Ghost: Asking "Why has evolution given us the ability to", particularly about something like story-telling, assumes that every last jot and tittle of humanity has been carefully honed by evolution so that every trait adds to our fitness.

Posted by: David Cohen at March 31, 2005 6:07 PM

David -

Thanks for the clarification. I agree with your implicit skepticism. I do believe those archetypal stories are innate ... or at least that a predisposition to narrate those stories is innate ... but am not willing to attribute them to Darwinian causes.

Posted by: ghostcat at March 31, 2005 6:28 PM

I once saw a quote attributed to Steven Speilburg that there were only three movie plots:

man vs man
man vs nature
dog vs vampire.

Posted by: Mike Earl at March 31, 2005 7:49 PM

Norton Frye? Wasn't that the litcrit guy from the 50s w/a similar theory?

Posted by: Jim in Chicago at March 31, 2005 8:52 PM

The fact that a story as old as, say, the Iliad, can still be read today, is remarkable. It's hardly obvious that it should be so. Modern Enlightened Thought would predict that it could not be so. Our socioeconomic circumstances are so different from those of Homer's listeners, how could anything meaningful to them, mean anything to us? So the persistence of the Iliad proves one thing: Modern Enlightened Thought is bunk.

It also suggests that there is indeed some inherent structure to stories, whether plot outlines or something else. The mere survival of society may suggest the same. If television were not forced to tell stories that structurally promote concepts necessary to society, how have we survived?

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at March 31, 2005 9:44 PM

Robert Heinlein said there are three plots: Boy Meets Girl; The Little Tailor ((a regular person caught up in big events)); and The Man Who Learned Better.

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at March 31, 2005 9:46 PM

The Internet Public Library lists the theories in The Basic Plots in Literature as either 1 plot, 3 plots, 7 plots, 20 plots, or 36 (or 37) plots, depending on how fine a distinction you want to make.

Posted by: jd watson at March 31, 2005 10:38 PM

Bob: Who among us doesn't from time to time feel the urge to go sack Troy?

Posted by: David Cohen at April 1, 2005 12:06 AM

I tend to agree with Spielburg on the lesser number than seven and C.S. Lewis on the nature of the phenomenon, as posted above.

Wonder what the brothers Grimm had to say on the subject?

Posted by: Genecis at April 1, 2005 10:28 AM
« THE GOYS WHO CRIED WOLF: | Main | ARTICLES OF FAITH »