March 30, 2005
WELL, AT LEAST HE GOT GEOCENTRISM RIGHT:
Ptolemy Tilted Off His Axis: Studying a statue of Atlas holding the sky, an American astronomer finds key evidence of what could be a major fraud in science history. (John Johnson, March 30, 2005, LA Times)
In a sunlit gallery of the Museo Archeologico Nazionale in Italy, astronomer Brad Schaefer came face to face with an ancient statue known as the Farnese Atlas.Posted by Orrin Judd at March 30, 2005 8:44 AMFor centuries, the 7-foot marble figure of the mythological Atlas has bent in stoic agony with a sphere of the cosmos crushing his shoulders.
Carved on the sphere — one of only three celestial globes that have survived from Greco-Roman times — are figures representing 41 of the 48 constellations of classical antiquity, as well as the celestial equator, tropics and meridians.
Historians have long looked on the Atlas as a postcard from the past — interesting largely as astronomical art.
But as Schaefer approached, he began to notice subtle details in the arrangement of the constellations. It wasn't that anything was wrong with the statue. If anything, the positions of the constellations were too perfect to be mere decoration.
He was more than a little intrigued. No, this was no mere piece of art. Taking out his camera, he was about to take a journey through the centuries to unravel one of the great mysteries of the ancient world and uncover key evidence in what may be one of the biggest cases of fraud in the history of science.
I have always admired those who can see something in plain sight that the rest of us cannot.
Posted by: Rick T. at March 30, 2005 9:34 AM--The feud holds little interest for Schaefer, who has moved on. The National Science Foundation has given him a grant to review 156 years of sunspot records.
The goal? To find out if the sun has a role in global warming.--
OH, is this going to be fun.
My friend who wrote his dissertation on Hipparchus and now is a member of a department of astronomy at a major university said:
"I did see the Hipparchus piece, and I am skeptical of that also. It is hard to believe that the positions on the Farnese Atlas could be precise enough to allow a secure dating."
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at March 30, 2005 11:45 AMMethinks global warming is about to be debunked. As the poster above notes, academics who have based their careers on false presumptions won't readily accept Schaefer's findings. "Scholars" are often more interested in pursuing grants than pursuing the truth.
Maybe times are changing. Drudge has an article about Ann Coulter getting several standing O's at the People's Republic of Lawrence, Kansas.
Who woulda thunk it?
Posted by: erp at March 30, 2005 1:18 PMPlease distinguish between global warming, which is indisputable, and anthropogenic global warming, which is not.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at April 1, 2005 1:43 AMHarry:
Now you sound like an I.D.er. You should know better than to ask folks to differentiate mechanisms.
Posted by: oj at April 1, 2005 8:09 AMDarwinism is all about mechanism, Orrin.
Posted by: Harry Eagar at April 1, 2005 2:45 PMPrecisely.
Posted by: oj at April 1, 2005 2:52 PM