March 21, 2005

THE UNIQUELY AMERICAN CANON (via Robert Schwartz):

H.P. Lovecraft's Afterlife: He was an atheist and a nihilist, and he's more influential than ever. (JOHN J. MILLER, March 15, 2005, Opinion Journal)

For a man who didn't believe in the afterlife, H.P. Lovecraft sure is having a remarkable one. Few people had heard of him when he died at the age of 46 on this date in 1937, and fewer still had read the stories he sold to tacky pulp magazines. Nowadays, however, Stephen King and just about everybody else in the know recognizes him as the 20th century's most influential practitioner of the horror story--a claim he arguably clinched last month with the publication of his best works in a definitive edition.

If our country's literary canon has a dress code, then surely it involves those shiny black jackets covering the volumes produced by the Library of America. Lovecraft's new one runs for more than 800 pages and includes 22 novellas and short stories with titles such as "The Horror at Red Hook," "At the Mountains of Madness" and "The Thing on the Doorstep." There are now 25,000 copies in print, which is an above-average number for the nonprofit publisher. (A book of Louisa May Alcott's "Little Women" and other writings, released at the same time, has an initial printing of 19,000.)

As with so much genre fiction, Lovecraft's oeuvre isn't for everyone. Some people just can't see past the wooden characters, overwrought prose, and fantastic speculations about the nature of the universe. The dialogue occasionally descends into Howard Dean-like howls of "Eh-ya-ya-ya-yahaah!" Edmund Wilson once quipped that the only horror in Lovecraft's corpus was the author's "bad taste and bad art."

Yet it is difficult to deny his enormous importance in a field of literature whose roots stretch back to the Gothic novels of Anne Radcliffe, the prescient nightmares of Mary Shelley, and the macabre mind of Edgar Allan Poe. Even the most respectable authors have taken advantage of the conventions these writers created and refined. "The Turn of the Screw" by Henry James, after all, is a pretty good ghost story.

Lovecraft wrote in this dark and distinguished tradition, and much of his early work displays the influence of Poe and other predecessors. By the late 1920s, however, he was no longer a mere dwarf standing on the shoulders of giants but a genuine innovator whose lasting impact appears mainly in a set of stories known as the "Cthulhu Mythos." They begin with "The Call of Cthulhu," written in 1926 and one of Lovecraft's finest pieces. It's about a young sculptor's bizarre dreams, a hideous statuette he manufactures in his sleep, a dastardly voodoo cult, a shadowy book called the Necronomicon, and a menacing encounter in the Pacific Ocean with a monster that's perhaps best described as a gargantuan alien octopus with wings (and owning the unpronounceable name "Cthulhu").

This may sound silly and, at a certain level, it surely is. Yet "The Call of Cthulhu" is also strangely engrossing, and contains many elements that will be familiar to fans of "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown: The main character is an Ivy League professor determined to investigate ancient mysteries and their lingering effects on the present day. Readers who become accustomed to Lovecraft's writing style may find that it possesses a florid eloquence.

They will also appreciate his skill at producing a sense of mounting dread.


Interesting that the genre is so very American, presumably because we so devoutly believe in the reality of Evil.

Posted by Orrin Judd at March 21, 2005 6:21 PM
Comments

I still have my "Cthulu For President, Why Settle For The Lesser Evil" bumpersticker.

Posted by: Pete at March 21, 2005 11:54 PM

I was a fan of Lovecraft in my teenage years, wrote an 11th grade term paper comparing him to some other horror writer of that period whom I cannot remember. Several of his stories were used on Rod Serling's "Night Gallery" series in the early 70's.

He was a native of Providence, RI, my birthplace as well. He set many of his stories in a fictional rural area northwest of Boston along the "Miskatonic" river. I liked "The Colour Out of Space" the most of his stories. He was a master at hinting at horror, allowing the reader's mind to fill in the blanks.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at March 22, 2005 1:41 AM

In my youthful D&D days we experiemented with a Lovecraft dungeon module. "You turn a corner and encounter and Cy'augtha, roll for insanity. Oops, sorry.. You bump into Nyarlathrotep, roll, oops." I don't think any character survived more than an hour. We quickly went back to AD&D.

Posted by: Gideon at March 22, 2005 3:41 AM

I read the "The Dunwich Horror" when I was seven or eight and it still sends chills down my spine. It was his twin brother, but it looked more like the father than he did... jeepers.

Posted by: joe shropshire at March 22, 2005 12:08 PM

Like the other pulp fiction great, Robert E Howard, Lovecraft is sometime very good, sometimes just cranking out the same old, same old. His stories often have the feel of unfinished work, that just one more re-write would have produced a masterpiece. There was a Lovecraft revival in the '70's, and I read most of his stuff then. I thought At The Mountains of Madness was his best story.

Posted by: Lou Gots at March 23, 2005 4:57 AM

Yet in almost every case, Poe to Lovecraft, it has been the French who appreciated these authors on a large scale while American fans were a devout, but cult, minority.

Lovecraft's power comes from his understanding of what makes man afraid, rather than following whatever tropes the genre previously used.

Chris Carter had a very Lovecraftian sense in creating X-Files and Millenium. Joss Whedon simply used horror tropes to give us what is merely a teen drama in Buffy, the Vampire Slayer.

Posted by: Chris Durnell at March 23, 2005 5:26 PM
« LIFE SONGS: | Main | SWAPPING THE ONE FOR THE OTHER WAS NO VICTORY: »