March 26, 2005

PAST TIME TO TURN INWARD, MR. PUTIN:

Russia Fumbles, and Former Sphere of Influence Deflates: Moscow has all but lost a hold on ex-Soviet states by underestimating the populace, analysts say. (Kim Murphy, March 26, 2005, NY Times)

The revolt in Kyrgyzstan that toppled Russia's strongest ally in Central Asia was the result of the latest in what analysts say is an astonishing and painful series of diplomatic missteps by Moscow.

Three largely nonviolent revolutions over the last 16 months have all but eliminated Moscow's attempt to dominate the former Soviet states that were once part of its unquestioned empire.

The sudden collapse of Kyrgyz President Askar A. Akayev's regime, after the overthrow of governments in Georgia and Ukraine, highlights the fundamental frailty of corrupt, unpopular post-Soviet regimes across the region — most seriously, potentially, in Russia itself.

As a result, the once-formidable power wielded by the Kremlin in the three former Soviet capitals has given way to an increasingly influential diplomatic role for the United States and Europe — in part, analysts say, because of Russia's failure to successfully manage foreign policy in a region it has declared vital to its own strategic interests.

"The entire world has now seen that Russia is powerless and incapable of doing anything. And next time, no one will even think about resorting to Russia's mediation services and patronage," said Stanislav Belkovsky, a political analyst with close ties to the Kremlin. "Everyone understands that the big lion is dead, and should not be feared."


It would have been better for everyone concerned had George H. W. Bush and the Realists not been in power when the Wall was torn down, so that the coup de grace could have been delivered despite the temporary instability it would have provoked. But you can't stop the End, only delay it.

Posted by Orrin Judd at March 26, 2005 8:49 AM
Comments

An old totalitarian who hasn't accepted the downfall of his former despotism. Is that what they mean by an "insurgent?"

Posted by: Lou Gots at March 26, 2005 5:46 PM
It would have been better for everyone concerned had George H. W. Bush and the Realists not been in power when the Wall was torn down
Sorry, OJ. I used to share this view, but Philip Bobbit argues very persuasively otherwise in his wonderful volume The Shield of Achilles. He's got me pretty much convinced now. Mind you, that's not to say that we should have continued to act through the 90's as we did, or that folks such as Scowcroft would not now be leading us in a very harmful direction, if they had the power to put their current recommendations into practice. But at the time Bush's approach might well have been the best possible.
Posted by: Kirk Parker at March 26, 2005 6:05 PM
« EAST IS EAST...AND WEST: | Main | KEEP THE BUDGET CUTTERS, PURGE THE EUROPHILES: »