March 9, 2005

FINAL ANWR:

Senate Gearing Up for Fight Over Oil Drilling in Alaska: Republicans say they are planning a legislative maneuver to push President Bush's plan through that would avoid the threat of filibusters. (SHERYL GAY STOLBERG, 3/09/05, NY Times)

After years of watching Democrats block President Bush's plan to allow oil drilling in an Alaskan wildlife refuge, Senate Republicans say they are planning a legislative maneuver to push it through that would avoid the threat of filibusters, which have killed the measure in the past.

The maneuver, which senators and Congressional aides said would be made public Wednesday as part of the Senate budget resolution, would open the door to drilling with a simple majority of 51 votes, instead of the 60 required to block a filibuster. The same move failed two years ago, but with 55 Republican senators - four more than before - proponents of the drilling say they have fresh hope that Congress will vote this year to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a central component of Mr. Bush's energy policy.

"The people who are for this, ANWR, have to have 51 votes," said Senator Pete V. Domenici, the New Mexico Republican and champion of the drilling provision, using the acronym (pronounced AN-war) for the refuge. "The people who are against it can take it out with 51 votes. All we're saying is, that seems pretty American, pretty fair."


Posted by Orrin Judd at March 9, 2005 8:17 AM
Comments

Back during the Iranian oil embargo of 1979, people who were near BP or Arco gas stations were at an advantage, since they were the main companies benfitting from the new Alaksan Oil pipeline from the North Slope, and as a result, their gas prices (at least in the northeast) were often 10-15 cents lower than their competitors, who were more tied to foreign oil imports.

I'm not sure if the same secnario works here, as far as what firms would and wouldn't go into ANWR. But it would be fun to allow Democratic senators, or at a lower level, Democratic governors and state legislatures, to "opt out" of allowing oil companies in their states to use the new oil resource in the future, assuring those states of high gas and heating oil prices.

Posted by: John at March 9, 2005 8:45 AM

The denigration of a majority vote as "a legislative maneuver" is one of the saddest indicators of the sorry stte of liberalism today.

Posted by: Dan at March 9, 2005 10:01 AM
« APPLYING THE LESSON OF IRAQ: | Main | COINCIDENTAL PLAN: »