March 13, 2005
COME INTO MY PARLOR, SAID THE SPIDER TO THE FLY:
Mr. Bush's Stealthy Tax Increase (NY Times, March 13, 2005)
President Bush is presiding over a big middle-class tax hike.As recently as 2000, only about one million taxpayers owed the alternative minimum tax, created by a provision in the federal tax code that is supposed to prevent multimillionaires from using loopholes to avoid paying their fair share. But by the time Americans file their 2005 taxes, some 3 million taxpayers will owe the alternative tax and by 2010, nearly 30 million taxpayers will be hit - among them, a staggering 94 percent of married filers who have children and make $75,000 to $100,000.
Big families in high-tax states - New York, New Jersey, California and Massachusetts - will bear the heaviest burden, largely because the alternative tax increasingly disallows write-offs for dependents, state income taxes and local property taxes. On average, by 2010, people who make under $100,000 and owe the alternative tax will pay an additional $1,321 in federal income taxes, while alternative tax payers who make between $100,000 and $200,000 will owe an additional $2,592.
Meanwhile, and most outrageous, only 35 percent of taxpayers who earn $1 million or more will owe the alternative tax.
Don't you love it when the Timesmen beat the drums for tax reform? Posted by Orrin Judd at March 13, 2005 9:40 AM
The Times is blaming Bush for the AMT which has been around for 20 yrs and Bush has said he wants to get rid of it? Serious chutzpuh by the Times.
Posted by: AWW at March 13, 2005 7:40 PMAWW: it's older than that (1969) and worse than that: I'll bet the Times was on the original bandwagon for the AMT, on "soak the rich" grounds.
Posted by: PapayaSF at March 13, 2005 8:52 PMNot indexing it to inflation was a great idea (for a Leftist), except that the high housing costs and high local taxation in urban areas like D.C, Calif., N.Y. and Seattle means that their own constuencies feel the bite before those intolerant white rubes in Alabama, Indiana and Montana. Definitely deserves a muntz or two.
The editorial was just incoherent. I assume that somebody like Keller or Collins got his return back from his accountant yeaterday. Hey you wanted the rich to pay more taxes.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at March 14, 2005 1:34 AM