March 2, 2005

BULL BREASTS:

What to Make of the 'New' Middle East: Democrats and Republicans search for the spin (Howard Fineman, March 2, 2005, Newsweek)

I made a quick survey of Hill offices and the Democratic National Committee, and heard nothing but silence from leading members of the party about Middle East events. Not a peep, aides said, from Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean or Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid or most of the party’s presidential wannabes, even those who voted to authorize the war in Iraq.

The reasons, a top Senate aide told me, are two-fold. One: a trend of a few weeks or months is inconclusive. More important, he said, the White House would pounce on any Democratic cheerleading now as proof that the Iraq war was justified, despite grave questions about the administration’s original justifications for it. Bush is trying to backdate a blank check, in the view of these Democrats, and they don’t feel like helping him cash it.

But the risk, even this aide concedes, is that the Democrats will miss the chance to express their solidarity with universal—and American—ideals and aspirations. In the last century, it was Democrats who lead us in reaching for those stars: Wilson, FDR, Truman and JFK. “We can’t just be the party of ‘no,’” the aide said.


Too late.

Posted by Orrin Judd at March 2, 2005 8:09 PM
Comments

As in "useless as ..."

Yep.

Posted by: ghostcat at March 2, 2005 8:21 PM

> But the risk, even this aide concedes, is that the Democrats will miss the chance to express their solidarity with universaland Americanideals and aspirations.

This is so contemptible, I should have something pithy and clever to say about it. But I can't get over how contemptible it is.

Posted by: Bob Hawkins at March 2, 2005 9:36 PM

the democrats are tainted goods. i really get the sense they are mortally wounded as a national party. like the black knight they can still make a spectacle of themselves but not much else. good riddance.

Posted by: cjm at March 2, 2005 10:11 PM

Wonder if Dean can convince Joe Lieberman to go on a one-man Democratic Party "Freedom and Democracy in the Middle East Victory Tour," just so party leaders can film it and have something to show to their grandkids.

Posted by: John at March 2, 2005 10:28 PM

Just one more indication that the party of slavery, secession, segregation, quotas and filibusters is about to join the other party founded around the same time as the Jackon presidency, the Whigs, belongs in the dustbin of history.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at March 2, 2005 10:45 PM

Their vision is as crabbed as that of the GOP members who opposed the Marshall Plan. The good thing is that of the American people was not so crabbed then, and certainly is not today.

Posted by: Bart at March 3, 2005 6:54 AM

The Marshall Plan was a disaster for Europe, though by destroying them permanently it helped us.

Posted by: oj at March 3, 2005 7:28 AM

OJ,

Europeans do not see it that way. It achieved its goal of encouraging European voters to elect governments which were on our side during the Cold War. If you meet Euros who were kids during WWII, they will tell you how grateful they were for that American assistance. I know you don't see that as important, even though pretty much every serious analyst on both sides of the Atlantic did.

Posted by: Bart at March 3, 2005 5:22 PM

Bart:

Of course they like it--they got to keep the social welfare system that takes care of them though thwarting any future. As David says, at least we don't have to worry about them anymore.

Posted by: oj at March 3, 2005 6:14 PM

OJ,

That whole Wirtschaftswunder thing just escaped your notice, eh?

Posted by: Bart at March 4, 2005 8:42 AM

Bart:

There's no such thing. Rebuilding follows damage and creates good economic juju. FL notoriously reaps terrific economic benefits from hurricane damage in similar fashion.

Posted by: oj at March 4, 2005 8:52 AM

OJ,

Those insurance payments have nothing to do with it? I'll keep that in mind the next time I do a filing for a rate increase. Dear Commissioner, I know that our payments went down but rebuilding automatically follows damage and creates good economic juju, the amounts of money insurance companies pay off has nothing to do with it. So, since the policyholders benefit whether we pay off or not, shouldn't we still get that rate increase because of the economic benefits created even though we don't pay a dime.

Somehow, I don't see too many Insurance Commissions being terribly convinced by that argument, no matter how arithmetically-illiterate and staggeringly uncreative they may be.

The Marshall Plan behaved like an insurance payment to the victims of a natural disaster, creating the conditions whereby the rebuilding could take place. Sure, they could have rebuilt things themselves, after 150 years Germany was back to where it was before the 30 Years War, and Picardy today has almost as many people as it had before the Black Death. But, if you want a quick turnaround, and politics demanded that we get a quick turnaround in Europe in the 40s because the Commies were damn close to winning local elections, you have to prime the pump. Europe had its act together more or less after less than a decade and the reason for that was American aid.

Posted by: Bart at March 4, 2005 9:44 AM

Bart:

You're arguing against your own point.

Posted by: oj at March 4, 2005 9:51 AM

If you don't believe that the speed of the turnaround matters, maybe so. But we had to prime the pump in the 40s or else the Iron Curtain would have been in the Mid-Atlantic. Whether it was long-term sound economic policy is open to question, but it worked in the short-term and as Baron Tilton used to say 'In the long run, we are all dead.'

Posted by: Bart at March 5, 2005 9:58 AM

Spain which got no Marshall aid had the fastest growing economy in Europe.

Nor is there any reason to believe that letting Stalin try to run the whole place wouldn't have been better strategically.

Posted by: oj at March 5, 2005 10:03 AM

Spanish growth was like PRC growth is today. They started at such a low level, the place was hemorrhaging labor to Latin America for centuries, that they had nowhere to go but up. I would remind you who was in steerage in 'Ship of Fools'. Itinerant day workers from Southern Spain.

Posted by: Bart at March 6, 2005 7:50 AM

As opposed to Japan and Germany which we'd leveled?

Posted by: oj at March 6, 2005 10:03 AM
« DELIVERANCE IS AT HAND: | Main | ALL OVER BUT THE FOUNDING CEREMONIES: »