March 12, 2005
A PERFECT STORM (via Robert Schwartz):
'Why am I not dead?' (DON COLBURN, March 04, 2005, The Oregonian)
An Estacada man's attempt at doctor-assisted suicide last month took a bizarre turn when he woke from a coma nearly three days later and lived for two more weeks.David E. Prueitt, 42, who had lung cancer, died at home of natural causes Feb. 15 -- 16 days after he ingested a supposedly lethal dose of medication prescribed by one of his doctors in accordance with Oregon's Death With Dignity Act.
Barbara Coombs Lee, co-president of the assisted-suicide advocacy group Compassion & Choices, confirmed Prueitt's case Thursday after family members went public with details.
"He did take a complete dose and slept soundly for 65 hours," Lee said. "Then he awakened. He suffered no ill effects. He was fully capable and competent -- and surprised."
Prueitt's wife, Lynda Romig Prueitt, recalled that when he woke early Feb. 2, he asked: "What the hell happened? Why am I not dead?"
He survived 13 more days, coherent and alert, she said, before dying of his cancer. [...]
Prueitt's experience has divided his family. Janice Davidson, Prueitt's older sister, said she opposes doctor-assisted suicide for religious reasons and was shocked to find out about her brother's attempted suicide.
"I believe that if his family had been notified, David would not have done this," she said. She visited him a few days after he woke up from the drug overdose and described him as coherent.
"If it was an assisted suicide, it wasn't done right."
Prueitt had an up-and-down life. Relatives described him as a proud, hardworking logger who smoked for years. Records show that he served seven years in prison after a rape conviction.
His grown daughter, DeAnndra Rowland, said her father told her in January that he "wanted to go in his sleep." He never mentioned doctor-assisted suicide or the Death With Dignity Act, she said.
Prueitt kept his attempted suicide from most relatives and friends, his wife said, because "he didn't want them to think he was taking the easy way out." [...]
Two days after Prueitt woke up, he told his wife he had been in the presence of God, she said. By her account, Prueitt said God had rejected his death by suicide and sent him back to live out his days and die a natural death.
Steve Prueitt, of Beaverton, David's brother, opposes doctor-assisted suicide for religious reasons and said he thinks his brother was chosen by God as an example of why assisted suicide is wrong.
"God chose David as his spokesman with reference to physician-assisted suicide, absolutely," Steve Prueitt said.
David Prueitt was under home hospice care provided by Providence Hospice. His main hospice nurse was not aware that Prueitt chose assisted suicide until after the attempt, his wife said.
Prueitt was taken by ambulance to Providence Portland Hospital for one night about a week before he died, his wife said. She said she called the hospital because he was having a panic attack and accusing her of trying to kill him. His brother arrived to reassure him that was not the case. [...]
But Dr. Kenneth Stevens, vice president of Physicians for Compassionate Care and chairman of the radiation oncology department at Oregon Health & Science University, called Prueitt's death a failed assisted suicide. The most likely reason for such a failure, he said, is that the patient did not consume the complete lethal dose.
"We've always been concerned that the dose would not always be lethal and that there would be complications. In this situation, living is considered a complication."
It's all the awful things about this barbaric practice wrapped up in one: the vulnerable patient being murdered against his will; the doctors who now view his life as a failure rather than his death; the time remaining to him; etc., etc., etc. Posted by Orrin Judd at March 12, 2005 8:41 AM
All the awful things and one good thing: the would-be murder victim spared to know, love and serve God for a few more days.
Posted by: Lou Gots at March 12, 2005 9:11 AMAll the awful things and one good thing: the would-be murder victim spared to know, love and serve God for a few more days.
Posted by: Lou Gots at March 12, 2005 9:11 AM"Murdered against his will" is non-factual nonsense in this case. The man changed his mind after (figuratively) grazing himself with a large caliber bullet. Free will, all the way.
Posted by: ghostcat at March 12, 2005 12:15 PM"Two days after Prueitt woke up, he told his wife he had been in the presence of God, she said. By her account, Prueitt said God had rejected his death by suicide and sent him back to live out his days and die a natural death."
In a less cynical society, we would regard this as a message.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at March 12, 2005 12:23 PMghost:
Just keep telling yourself it was what he wanted....
Posted by: oj at March 12, 2005 12:39 PMOJ -
It's pretty clear that both choices ... first to take his own life, and then to die naturally ... were what the man wanted. He may have led a life of questionable and ambivalent choices, but they were his to make.
You have previously conceded, if I recall correctly, that a mentally- competent individual might choose suicide. You will never concede, it seems, that others may ethically support either the chosing or the self-execution.
Posted by: ghostcat at March 12, 2005 2:14 PMghost:
His wife kept it secret even from the staff at the hospital where he was and you think it was his will?
Posted by: oj at March 12, 2005 2:21 PMAgain, factually incorrect. He was under at-home hospice care, not in a hospital.
And he was a mentally-competent, terminally-ill adult when he ... not she ... made both choices.
Posted by: ghostcat at March 12, 2005 2:30 PMghost:
Did you read the story? She took him out of the hospital, brought him home to be killed, had to bring him to a hospital when he accused her of same, but was then convinced she wasn't. She then gave him the dose and even his hospice nurse didn't know about it. How gullible do you insist on being here?
Posted by: oj at March 12, 2005 2:42 PMI not only read the story, OJ, I brought it to your attention on two different threads the day it came out. And I've followed the extensive media coverage here in the Portland area ever since.
There's not been the slighest suggestion that the wife killed him. He requested the Seconal three times, twice orally and once in writing. There were four witnesses present when he ingested it. He had previously told his daughter that he wished to die in his sleep.
Yes, I know. The wife appears to have chosen at least two of those witnesses, and the other two are "Death With Dignity advocates". Moreover, I'll stipulate that she may have preferred him dead. He, by many indications, was a life-long SOB.
Still, as I said, there's been no suggestion that he took the Seconal unwillingly. Not even his birth family, as unhappy as they have been with the entire episode, has claimed that.
I await Justice Ginsberg's reasoning on the underlying issues. I suspect she is keenly aware of both your sensitivities and mine. Peace.
Posted by: ghostcat at March 12, 2005 8:47 PMWould "pious cynic" be oxymoronic?
Posted by: ghostcat at March 12, 2005 11:43 PMCynicism is just piety unleavened by love.
Posted by: oj at March 12, 2005 11:51 PMMenckenesque. Damn good, if original.
I often wonder why so many of these threads obsess about linear logic when you obviously have a gift for intuition. Never mind.
Posted by: ghostcat at March 13, 2005 12:09 AM